BFS

This is a search result page



World Business Lenders Rings in 2016

December 18, 2015
Article by:

On December 8th, World Business Lenders (WBL) wrapped up 2015 and prepared for the coming new year at their annual shareholder meeting hosted at the Waldorf Astoria in New York City. The event, which was mostly restricted to company employees, referral partners and shareholders, featured some out-of-town guest speakers including BFS Capital CEO Marc Glazer and RapidAdvance Chairman Jeremy Brown.

Alex Gemici, Marc Glazer, and Jeremy Brown

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: Alex Gemici of WBL, Marc Glazer of BFS Capital, and Jeremy Brown of RapidAdvance

On a panel moderated by WBL Managing Director Alex Gemici, Brown and Glazer expressed their optimism for the industry’s future, but to some extent heeded caution. Brown specifically made reference to his prediction of a bursting bubble but conceded that he might have been off by a year or two. Glazer reminded the audience that both executives had weathered the financial crisis so that they had witnessed firsthand how a recession can affect their businesses, and made them stronger because of it.

WBL CEO Doug Naidus made a similar admission in his presentation, in that he thought that the bubble of unsecured lending would burst in 2015 but that it hadn’t happened yet. Still, he thinks it’s right around the corner. One of their primary hedges against a correction is that they secure their loans against real estate. Naidus has a background in mortgage lending so it’s a market they’re familiar with.

World Business Lenders CEO Doug Naidus

Doug Naidus, CEO of World Business Lenders

Another one of their key strategies is the franchise model. Over the last two years, WBL has acquired commercial finance brokerages and converted them into originating houses for their collateralized loan program. It has had a really positive impact on their growth and on their margins, according to information disclosed at the event. It’s expected that they will continue to pursue more acquisitions.

Chris Pepe Zach Ramirez and Sean Murray

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT: Chris Pepe of WBL, Zach Ramirez of WBL and Sean Murray of AltFinanceDaily

World Business Lenders Waldorf Astoria NYC
Snapshot at the Waldorf Astoria

The sentiment of the event was rather festive and optimistic, with WBL enjoying a positive trajectory of growth and success.

Business Financial Services Acquires Entrust Merchant Solutions

August 26, 2015
Article by:

M&A AlertA representative for Coral Springs, FL-based Business Financial Services (BFS) has confirmed that the company has acquired Entrust Merchant Solutions. Entrust is a well established and widely known NY-based ISO/broker shop that was founded in 2007. As part of the deal, Entrust CEO Ilya Fridman will remain with the company and for the time being, the Entrust name will not change. They are now a part of the BFS family of companies however.

The news comes on the heels of a major milestone. Just a month ago, BFS announced that they had funded more than $1 Billion since inception, earning them a spot as one of the industry’s largest players.

The Entrust acquisition is representative of an M&A trend taking place in the industry. Below is a list of some of the more recent ones:

  • Enova International acquired The Business Backer (for $27 million)
  • Merchants Capital Access acquired Reliant Funding
  • Capital Z Partners acquired Pearl Capital
  • World Business Lenders acquired the business loan operations of Plan B Growth (and has made 11 acquisitions total over the past 12 months)

Prior to the deal, Entrust was an ISO for BFS. Over the last few days though, some insiders speculated that the relationship had suddenly grown even tighter. It turns out they were right.

Business Financial Services Joins The Billion Dollar Club

July 29, 2015
Article by:

BFS LogoYet another small business financing company has surpassed a historic milestone. Representatives for Coral Springs, FL-based Business Financial Services, Inc. confirmed that they have funded $1 Billion since inception. BFS, as they’re known in the industry, was founded in 2002, though nearly half of their volume was funded in just the past two years.

AltFinanceDaily had recently speculated that BFS had funded somewhere between $700 million and $1.2 billion in their lifetime. They are now one of seven companies confirmed to have reached the billion dollar threshold.

New York City-based Merchant Cash and Capital announced hitting the billion dollar mark only four months ago.

“This milestone is indicative of how much demand there is for working capital among small businesses, the backbone of the U.S. economy,” said Marc Glazer, CEO and co-founder of BFS.


BFS/Boost Capital CEO Marc Glazer on Bloomberg London in 2013
Much like Capify, a newly-formed lending conglomerate with operations in multiple countries, BFS has a presence in Canada and the United Kingdom. In the U.K., where they operate as Boost Capital, they’ve got an active relationship with the press.

Norman Carson, director of business development for Boost Capital, recently told The Telegraph, “Smaller companies in Britain have been told for too long that they’re inadequate in some way, operating in too risky a field, lacking in assets, or trading in the wrong way.”

Several commercial finance brokers put BFS in the same league as OnDeck and CAN Capital competitively. Referring to BFS, Arty Bujan of New York City-based Cardinal Equity told AltFinanceDaily, “I think they’re great and serve a specific sector of our industry for merchants that need more money and are willing to prove they’re worthy of it.” He added that the documentation requirements at least in his experience can be a little bit more stringent than for competing companies that promise to fund almost immediately.

And Chad Otar, a Managing Partner of Excel Capital Management, also of New York City, said, “Business Financial Services is a great addition to have in your pocket for the longer deals.”

$1 billion fundedIn April of this year, BFS extended its credit line with its bank group led by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. “We are excited to reach this milestone, as it is fueled by our ability to meet the financing needs of so many businesses of different sizes across more than 400 industries,” said Glazer.

BFS is the only billion-dollar-plus funder on the AltFinanceDaily leaderboard to be based outside of New York City or Silicon Valley. South Florida is widely considered to be one of the top three hubs for tech-based lending. This milestone for BFS is a validation of that.

“With a high percentage of our customers renewing with us, and doing so at higher amounts, we are well-positioned for continued growth,” Glazer said.

Catch up with Alternative Business Lending

May 7, 2013
Article by:

rocket launchIf you feel like you’re falling behind on the news, you’re not alone. Things are happening FAST. here’s what you need to know:

5/7/13: Google Looks to Profit from Alternative Lending. Say hello to Mother Google.

5/6/13: Forbes interview with a Kabbage co-founder. It did not sound like they plan on remaining exclusive to the e-commerce side of business lending.

5/3/13: Summary of the ETA Expo. ACH is now the leading platform behind Merchant Cash Advance.

5/2/13: Google Acquires a Stake in Lending Club. This of course begged the question that was asked in BusinessWeek the next day on 5/3/13 in Does Google Want to be a Small Business Lender?

5/2/13: IOU Central smashes last year’s numbers. Publicly traded in Canada, this funder is only picking up steam.

5/1/13: Google Ventures and Peter Thiel invest in On Deck Capital. How’s that for big names?

5/1/13: My Silicon Valley VC prediction comes true with the On Deck and Lending Club announcements.

4/24/13: Business Financial Services Upgrades to $82 million credit facility. Not too shabby

4/24/13: IOU Central renews their credit facility.

4/24/13: Rumors begin to swirl that Amerimerchant has also landed a new credit facility. We have no confirmation on this.


How’s that for a 2 week span and those are just some of the headlines. More news is on the way as we are hearing rumors galore.

Be sure to join the industry chatter about these developments on DailyFunder in these 2 hot threads:
Google investing in the industry
OnDeck vs. Kabbage


I made another prediction back in February 2012 (Does Your Mom Sell Merchant Cash Advance?) in which I said consolidation was inevitable. With all these funders raising massive capital, mergers and acquisitions will be next on the agenda.

An Underwriter in Salesman’s Clothing

April 1, 2009
Article by:

call centerIt was mid-2006 and AdvanceMe was finding it wasn’t so alone in the world anymore. First Funds, Amerimerchant, Merchant Cash and Capital, BFS, among others were abuzz with a business model and a dream. Practically fresh out of college I joined one of the few funding companies as an underwriter. For a kid with little experience in an industry where no one had experience, I was fortunate to have graduated from a great business school. I had held off pursuing a CPA to see where the Merchant Advance wave would take me.

After my first week, I was hooked. Merchant processing, purchasing future receivables, private investors, and millions of dollars being pumped into small businesses were all part of an average day. After a month, I had complete sign-off ability to approve an account and wire funds out. “Fascinating,” I thought.

“3 Merchant processing statements and a signed contract.” This was the industry wide standard documentation at the time. If one Cash Provider wanted more documentation than that, the ISOs could divert their business to another Cash Provider in defiance. Cash Providers spent a lot of time courting and tending to the needs of their ISOs. It was truly a day when salesmen ran the Merchant Advance world.

I remember visiting giant telemarketing centers with 50-100 people spreading the word about the Merchant Advance to thousands of people a day. At one in particular, there was a legendary ex-stock broker at the front of the room rallying the troops on a megaphone. “Sell! Sell! Sell!” The Team Captains had their names up on giant marker board with their stats for the month. Combined, they were at $2 Million in sales so far.

After I had done my “courting” and “tending” to the brass of these sales warriors, I saw a 21-year old salesman being written a check for $20,000 for a sales benchmark he had just hit. Rumor had it that he was a pizza delivery guy living out of his car just 6 weeks before. I wondered how people were making THAT much money. It was hard not to be caught up in the commotion and excitement. Nobody knew when the growth of this product would stop exploding. It wasn’t long after that when one of my fellow underwriters resigned to get in the action. I didn’t blame him, but it just wasn’t for me. I was an analytical type guy, not the sales type.

I spent my days of 2007 learning and dealing with the fact that small businesses were taking Advances simultaneously, huge commissions were paid for deals that were defaulting, 10% Closing fees were being charged, and new terminals were being sent to merchants that provided them with the opportunity to divert sales away from the Cash Providers.

This was all happening while ISOs/Providers were quadrupling their staff to deal with the surge in applications. Too much was happening at once. There were situations where Cash Providers became so overburdened and technologically unprepared, that it would take weeks just to determine what a merchant owed on their Advance. That’s not a good position to be in.

In all the madness, our team of underwriters were ahead of the game. There were alarming trends that spelled disaster. We believed the sales model had gone awry. It was $10,000 for $13,500 for our company, a profit of $3,500. It was 10% Commission + 10% closing cost + increased merchant processing rates + terminal leases, a profit of $2,000+ for the sales company. That was way too much for having no liability. There was no way these additional fees could be tacked on to what could already be considered our expensive product.

I eventually became Manager of the entire underwriting department on my platform of conservative underwriting. Boy, was I unpopular. I found myself butting heads with salesmen all day. I lobbied for more documentation and the elimination of closing costs.

What I especially subconsciously disliked, was that some Advance salesmen my age were earning 4x more than I was annually and I considered myself to be earning a hefty sum. They would debate constantly about declines and make excuses for required paperwork their merchants couldn’t produce. It was a rule that no matter how terrible the submitted application and paperwork looked, a full workup and discussion of the deal with the salesman would be had. For certain submissions, this just didn’t seem to make sense. To the salesman who worked hard for the application, it meant the world to him.

Some of us thought their over-ambitious tactics and need for closing costs were the result of greed. “A bunch of fat cat brokers”, some of us would think. Sure, there were the guys out there making $30,000 in a month, but a lot of the day-to-day calls were from guys only making 1.5% on the Advance amount, only a portion of the closing cost, and had no idea what bankcard residuals were.

It didn’t faze me when a salesman pleaded that he had been pitching a particular merchant for over 3 months and the excuse for why his May processing statement was missing. “No statement, no funding,” I asserted. Rules were rules and I would not put up with someone trying to circumvent them. The merchant probably would’ve been just fine too.

Our underwriting group took a lot of heat from the Execs at our company. Conservative underwriting jeopardized demand. It was a terrible cost-benefit debacle that we faced day in and day out. Sounds similar to the mortgage broker/ bank dilemma eh?

FAST FORWARD……

It was late Summer, 2008. Our company was stable and in good hands. I basked in our accomplishment. Some of our competitors hadn’t been so lucky. Like the friend of mine who left before me over a year before, I wanted in on the action. I resigned and became a salesman.

I never wanted to manage an ISO, I wanted to be a salesman on the front lines. I wanted the ringing phones, the commotion, the marker boards with stats, the glory, the $20,000 checks.

I became an Advance salesman at the worst time in history. Fast Capital had long gone, Merit left the arena, and some of the good ‘ol boys had changed to renewals only. Submitted applications were responded to by computer programs saying my deal was ‘automatically declined due to something or other” and would not even be reviewed. “How could my deal not get reviewed? I spent 30 days pitching this merchant only to find out he wasn’t even worthy of review?” My subsequent calls were met by agitated voices at Cash Providers who couldn’t comprehend why I wanted to know the status only 2 days after I submitted the application.

I shrugged it off in the beginning. In fact I found myself not even submitting a large chunk of the applications I generated because they didn’t look like approval material. That was the underwriter in me. I learned it to be a harmful habit.

It was 10 straight declined deals later that I found myself wondering if I should submit everything I get just to make something happen. I extended the streak to 15 declines and my subsequent phone calls to Cash Providers were met with cold responses about Policy, Policy, Policy. “No Statement, No funding,” I was told. My argument that my merchant could not provide his November merchant statement went unheard. They could not understand why I was trying to circumvent rules. I wasn’t. The streak was extended to 20 declined deals. “Under 500 FICO, too many NSFs, landlord reference insufficient, volume under $5,000, etc.” Some would suggest certain marketing campaigns produce low quality merchants. Maybe, maybe not.

The streak was extended to 25 declined deals and a merchant I had been pitching for literally 4 months was finally giving me a shot. The sweat, the stress, and the dwindling commission paychecks led to the addition of a 2% closing cost on the deal. The merchant ok’d it and signed my form. My stats on the marker board were pathetic and I was far from glory. What happened next is ironic.

The Cash Provider got wind of the closing cost and called our office. Something was said about greed and overburdening their merchant. A warning was issued and they were going to watch my submissions more closely. 25 straight declined submissions done via a computer program e-mailing me a notice of decline with no human discussion, 4 months of sweat in closing a deal, and only a quarter of that 2% closing cost actually going into my pocket. That’s pre-tax by the way. Now I’m on their watch list.

I’ve got to appreciate the irony of it all. I understand where the Cash Providers are coming from. I’ve seen it through their eyes. The power is back in the Cash Providers hands but it has become too much so.

With restrictions so tight, our collective target merchant has relatively good credit, money in the bank, current with all their vendors and rent, consistent processing, sufficient gross sales, and be able to submit a large amount of paperwork. These merchants are harder to come by and many of the amateur salesmen will not be able to close someone like that. Ironically, I personally obtained a credit card last week with 0% APR for 12 months with a $20,000 limit. I submitted no documents and spoke to no one. All I did was fill in my info online.

Cash Providers charge an $8,000 fee for $20,000 and we all know the hoops the applicants have to jump through to get there. Interesting. Makes me think 1.40 factor rates will not last forever regardless of any credit crisis.

The Cash Providers that brag, “We have ISOs that submit 10 deals a month and get 10 approvals” should realize they surely generated way more applications than that. They just sent the ones they knew you would approve. Marketing and overhead costs were incurred on all of them.

Many are shouting that only the strong will survive in this new world order of Merchant Advances. I think lending will free up again one day and all the Cash Providers that think providing ISO support means having a computer program spit out automated response e-mails and a toll free number that no one of decision making capacity answers will find themselves alone. There should be a bit more “courting” and “tending” to the ISO’s needs. They need you badly right now and you can’t live without them.

Perhaps I’m just ahead of the game again. Maybe I should apply for an underwriting job.