SQUARE

This is a search result page



Amazon Sure is Making a Lot of Small Business Loans

March 26, 2017
Article by:

Amazon Capital ServicesAmazon had $661 million in seller receivables at the end of 2016, according to their earnings report, nearly double from the year before. These receivables are from loans made to small businesses (primarily to purchase inventory) who are sellers on their platform.

Apparently the lending business is going well for them too, since they claim the allowance for loan losses is so small that it’s not even material enough to report. And similar to Square Capital, Amazon incurs virtually no cost to acquire these borrowers.

One year ago, company CEO Jeff Bezos said in a letter to shareholders that “there are over 70,000 entrepreneurs with sales of more than $100,000 a year selling on Amazon.” By then the company had already lent more than $1.5 billion to small businesses across the US, UK and Japan.

“We wanted to bring the same shopping experience that you have on amazon, which is the one-click shopping experience, to the lending program,” a spokesperson says in a 2014 video about the program. “Instead of going to a bank, having interviews, audited financial statements, a 3 week process and then only a small fraction of people getting approved, our process is literally 3 fields and 3 clicks.”

The Top Small Business Funders of 2016

March 6, 2017
Article by:

The MCA and small business lending origination numbers for 2016 are in. In some cases, a company may have merely placed or facilitated an acquired customer with a partner or competitor (but still counted them in their annual volume) and thus the figures do not necessarily represent what actually went on balance sheet. The rankings omit some larger players for which no data could be confirmed and when a reasonable estimate could not be made.

Company Name 2016 Origination Volume 2015 2014
OnDeck $2,400,000,000 $1,900,000,000 $1,200,000,000
PayPal Working Capital $1,500,000,000* $900,000,000* $250,000,000*
Kabbage $1,250,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $400,000,000
CAN Capital $1,100,000,000* $1,500,000,000* $1,000,000,000*
Square Capital $798,000,000 $400,000,000 $100,000,000
Bizfi $550,000,000 $480,000,000 $277,000,000
Yellowstone Capital $460,000,000 $422,000,000 $290,000,000
Strategic Funding $375,000,000 $375,000,000 $280,000,000
National Funding $350,000,000 $293,000,000
BFS Capital $300,000,000
BlueVine $200,000,000*
Platinum Rapid Funding Group $180,000,000 $100,000,000
IOU Financial $107,600,000* $146,400,000 $100,000,000

*Asterisks signify that the figure is an estimate

Letter From the Editor – Jan/Feb 2017

March 4, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in AltFinanceDaily’s Jan/Feb 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

When AltFinanceDaily first launched online in 2010, I thought it was too late, that perhaps all the exciting changes in alternative finance had already taken place and that aside from a few obsessed geeks, there wasn’t that big of an audience to write for. It certainly felt a bit out-of-style, especially since I had been working in the industry for more than four years by that point. The only publication that was dedicated to the scene at the time had already come in to the public eye and vanished. Many alternative financial companies had met the same fate, thanks to the financial crisis.

In a way, AltFinanceDaily started off as a post-apocalyptic diary, an accounting of the industry’s survivors and their roles in the new world order. Primitive, my reporting may have been then, but interest quickly grew. By mid-2011, I was already forced to change web hosts to keep the website from slowing down. In my day job as a commercial finance broker, I continued to talk to small business owners all the over the country about a common theme, that banks just weren’t lending. And maybe they never would again, some predicted anyway. Or maybe the way loans were made in general would just never be the same.

Looking back among my old 2011 stories, I discovered that I had written a personalized review of Square’s payment technology and had given it high marks. Back then however, I saw Square as a payments toy. It was innovative and sexy, but unrelated to lending. Fast-forward to 2016 and Square’s capabilities have expanded. I should know, they funded my business exactly five years after my review. In this issue, I’ll walk you through what it was like to play the role of borrower, and put marketplace lending up to the ultimate test. Thanks to Square Capital, my journey has come full circle or more appropriately, full square.

This issue is the first of 2017. For alternative finance, it fortuitously feels like the beginning, not the end. If our descendants far in the future stumble upon these stories, I pray they will enjoy our accounts of the transformation, when entrepreneurs dared to look at the world in front of them and boldly decided to change it. It was the early 21st century, historians will say, when mankind dared to de-bank and change everything we knew about finance. In the here and now, you are a part of it all…

I Got Funded, OMG I’m a Merchant!

March 3, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in AltFinanceDaily’s Jan/Feb 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

OMGI’ve read the press releases, interviewed the executives, and written the summaries about the latest and greatest innovations in alternative finance. I’m the guy that’s supposed to know how everything in this industry works, but do I REALLY REALLY know? In the last decade, I’ve worn an underwriter hat, an MCA broker hat, a syndicator hat, a lead generator hat and a reporter hat just to name a few. This diverse array of experiences has surely influenced AltFinanceDaily’s success. But even as we publish content about the funders, lenders and other Fintech players in the wider industry, AltFinanceDaily is truly a small business first.

Independently owned, there are no investors in the company to turn to for assistance. And that’s not such a bad thing if you know at all what it can be like to have partners. At the end of last year, we did what hundreds of thousands of small businesses around the country have done, we got funded by a marketplace lender. Through that experience, I found myself wearing a brand new hat, one that says “merchant” on it.

On December 1st, my company received a deposit for $35,000. It was a loan from Square Capital and I didn’t pursue it for a story, but rather to facilitate cash flow at the busiest time of the year. I was moving into a larger office on the same floor of our building and the hustle and bustle of the pre-holiday craze was upon us. The circumstances may come off a bit cliché, simulated even, but there it was at the right time and the right place, an email telling me that my business had been “selected.” If you’ve ever wondered if that kind of marketing works, it must, because a half hour after reading through the materials, I made an educated decision and applied for a loan.

The higher-ups at Square Capital, those above the underwriting department, might have no idea that they even funded us (our legal name is different from our trademark publication name). And I haven’t reached out to them for comment because I didn’t want to turn this into a PR stunt or get them riled up about my account. But if you work at Square and you’re reading this now, you don’t need to hold your breath. Everything seemed to work just as the press releases, ads, and executives claim it does. Phew! That’s good for you, but it was also very good for me.

The most pleasant surprise was that our business got approved for the maximum amount advertised in their email. Here’s how it went down:

11/29/16
1:34 PM
Received email offering a business loan up to $35,000 to repay over 12 months

2:01 PM
Applied for $35,000, which consisted of logging into my Square account and tapping a button

8:02 PM
Got approved for $35,000

11/30/16
Square sent out the funds via ACH

12/1/16
Received full loan deposit in my business bank account

Square Capital OfferAll in all, it couldn’t have been any simpler. The deposit was for the full $35,000. And try as you might to hate me for saying this, I never calculated what the APR is. Square explained the cost as a fixed fee, which for me was $3,160. That’s approximately 9% of the principal of which the whole loan and fee would be repaid in equal installments over the next 12 months. To those that work in the industry, I got a 12-month 1.09 deal.

As a small business owner, I calculated whether or not it made sense to pay a set fee for $35,000 over that time period and determined it did. An APR would not have impacted my decision, nor would I really have found it helpful in determining the supposed true cost. The true cost is already there in black and white, the total dollars I agreed to pay.

Two things guided me, speed and economics. I wasn’t motivated to shop around to try and get the absolute best deal, just one that made economic sense with the least amount of work in the shortest amount of time. It sounds ironic to write that, especially as someone who has a bachelor’s in both Accounting and Finance but if you’re someone who works 7 days a week like I do, well maybe you’d understand my thought process. If I was applying for a million bucks, then yes, I’d shop and think on it pretty hard, but in my circumstances, a few thousand dollars in fees is relatively small stakes for the company. Besides, I was using the money proactively, as a positive tool.

I knew my patience for waiting was thin. For example, an experience with one of my banks earlier in the year had already left me rattled. I had asked to extend the limit of a business credit card and I was told that in order to do so, I’d have to visit the bank branch where I had originally signed up for the card (I don’t even live near that branch anymore) and that I would have to bring financial statements with me to present for review. By the way, this was for a limit increase to an amount that was much less than $35,000.

I learned that day that the rumors about (some) banks are true. They wanted me to visit a branch… and bring paperwork… for some kind of unspecified analysis… in 2016. Lo and behold I never showed up, and was more entrenched in my belief than ever before that the world needed to become de-banked and soon.

square capital approvedMy business already processes cards through Square so I’ve got a track record with them. Applying didn’t place any inquiries on my personal credit report nor did anyone at Square ever call me to ask me any questions. I know that most of their competitors conduct what is commonly known as a “merchant interview” prior to full approval or funding, but they didn’t. It wouldn’t have bothered me if they did though since we have a good business and would be using the money for the right reasons.

Alas, the entire process really all just came down to clicking a button online. I kept waiting for the catch, for them to let me down, to come up short of all the promises that the Fintech revolution has made about changing the world, but it never happened. A month later, Square withdrew their first payment from our account. Like I said earlier, I was satisfied with the entire process and it was a big help. Had I been given the option however, I might’ve opted to structure the arrangement differently and sold a portion of our future sales proceeds rather than simply borrow money. Allow me to explain.

It’s entirely possible that the next 12 months of business won’t pan out the way I project. If my sales drop, I still have to make the fixed monthly payment in accordance with my loan terms regardless. Not so when selling future sales since the delivery of those funds to the buyer is entirely tied to actual sales activity. A structure like this, what many consider a merchant cash advance, is actually what Square used to offer up until early 2016.

When the pace of sales slow down, delivery of the sales proceeds slows with it. When the pace of sales increases, so too does the delivery to the buyer. And if I went out of business, well then the buyer would get what they purchased, nothing.

Merchant cash advances are harder to bundle up and securitize though because there are no maturity dates nor is there even a guarantee the buyer will get what they purchased in full. They’re investments with loads of uncertainty built in for the buyer, and that’s probably why Square switched to loans and also probably why the cost of my loan was relatively inexpensive. They’ve minimized the uncertainties.

Nonetheless, the loan I ultimately got, is just fine. In the moment that I needed it, the process couldn’t have been any simpler or any faster. The banks have met their match. I got funded and loved it, now it’s your turn.

This article is from AltFinanceDaily’s Jan/Feb 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

The LendIt Story

February 12, 2017
Article by:

This story appeared in AltFinanceDaily’s Jan/Feb 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

Jason Jones
LendIt Co-founder Jason Jones

The LendIt Conference was supposed to be a smallish local meetup for New York-based members of the online lending community. But founders Jason Jones and Bo Brustkern soon discovered they had the makings of a big annual industrywide national convention. And before long, they found themselves replicating their successful American show on other continents.

To understand how the trade show was born and how it’s matured, flash back about seven years. In 2010, Jones and Brustkern were putting together venture capital deals when they happened onto the fledgling peer-to-peer lending movement. “Consumer credit was something we weren’t all that knowledgeable about, but we could see the market was large,” recalls Jones. “There was a clear opportunity that was structural in the market, and there were stable, consistent returns.” So the two of them launched one of the first P2P funds.

Their lending business soon took off, but Jones and Brustkern felt they were working in a void. The industry lacked community, and they decided to do something about it. Jones contacted his friend, Dara Albright, who had been organizing a series of crowdfunding conferences for Wall Street starting in mid 2011.

To heighten the credibility of the new confab, Jones, Brustkern and Albright decided to seek the help of Peter Renton. They didn’t know Renton personally but considered him “the voice of the industry,” Jones says. Renton had nurtured and sold off two printing businesses and used the proceeds to take up online lending as a hobby. He had also launched the Lend Academy in 2010 to teach the world about peer-to-peer lending. Somehow, he had also found the time to develop a following for himself as a blogger.

In early January of 2013, Jones and Albright cold-called Renton to gauge his interest in putting on a show. As fate would have it, Renton had just made a New Year’s resolution to launch a conference for lenders and was receptive to joining up. Together, they put a plan in action.

The originators put up their own money and worked together daily from January to June of 2013, when the first show convened. They secured space that would contain 220 people and calculated their break-even point as 200 attendees. “This was never intended to be a profitable enterprise,” Jones says of those early days. “This was something we all wanted to do for the community. We thought that if we wanted it, others would want it.”

More than 400 people registered for that first conference. “We had a line literally out the door,” Jones notes. “We had to shut off registration. We ended up squeezing about 375 people into that first event. It was completely shocking to us.” From the beginning, attendees came from all over the world. “That’s when I learned China had a P2P industry,” Jones says.

After the initial event, Jones, Brustkern and Renton formed a unified company. Renton brought in Lend Academy, while Jones and Brustkern added their investment fund. The conference also became part of the united company. Ever since, a holding company has owned all three businesses. Dara went on to launch Fintech Revolution TV and continues to support LendIt.

From the initial attendance of 375, the U.S. conference grew to 975 attendees in 2014, 2,500 in 2015, 3,500 in 2016 and a projected 5,000 for this year. About 33 percent of attendees come from the fintech industry, 23 percent are investors, 23 percent are service providers, 14 percent are banks and 2 percent come from government, the media and other backgrounds, Jones says. At first, many of the attendees come from the ranks of CEOs and managing partners, but that’s changing as the industry comes to view the conference as an annual convention where lower-ranking members of an organization can learn about the business, he notes.

Javits Center NYC
Jacob K. Javits Convention Center in NYC

Meanwhile, the exhibition floor is becoming an increasingly important component of the show. The gathering attracted 18 exhibitors in 2013, followed by 47 in 2014, 112 in 2015, 177 last year and an expected 210 this year. “We’re transforming from a conference-led event to an expo-led event,” Jones says. This year, exhibitor booths will occupy a 120,000 square-foot hall in New York’s Jacob K. Javits Convention Center.

The U.S. LendIt conferences alternate between San Francisco and New York City, renting larger spaces as the show has grown, Jones explains. Two years ago, the gathering seemed cramped in the gigantic New York Marriott Marquis near Times Square, he says, necessitating this year’s move to the Javits Center. Javits is designed for conventions with at least 10,000 attendees so the show is a little small for that venue, he admits. But the facility could become LendIt’s long-time New York home as growth continues, he predicts.

Jones traces some of the growth in exhibitors to the expansion of the fintech industry. “You have a meeting of the start-ups with the more traditional players who are rethinking their businesses and how to apply the new technology that’s being developed into their businesses,” he says.

Conferences that compete with LendIt in the fintech category are proliferating because of the nature of industry, in Jones’ view. As soon as fintech companies are launched, the internet quickly makes them national or even international in scope, he says. At the same time, the anonymity of cyberspace creates a need for gatherings that provide face-to-face meetings, he maintains. “They live online,” he says. “The spend their year online so there is a need for a convention to meet with their peers, their clients, their service-providers, their customers, their suppliers. There is a need for that physical connection.”

The increase in fintech conferences is also driven by content-related companies that provide articles on fintech innovation. Those sites have regarded conferences as money-makers that complement their journalistic endeavors, Jones says. For example, TechCrunch, an online publisher of technology industry news, puts on the TechCrunch Disrupt conferences in San Francisco, New York City, London and Beijing. In another example, Business Insider conducts the IGNITION conference.

Those forces – the internet, globalization and web-based publishing – are making themselves felt in the convention business in general, not just in fintech, Jones notes. Event-related companies trade at roughly 12 times EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization), he says, characterizing the convention business as “a very healthy category of our economy.”

LendIt USA 2016 With Peter Thiel

Fireside Chat with Peter Thiel, Entrepreneur and Investor, founder of PayPal, moderated by Emily Change of Bloomberg, at the LendIt USA 2016 conference in San Francisco, California, USA on April 12, 2016. (photo by Gabe Palacio)

Still, the fintech field’s crowded with more than 30 conferences, but LendIt is succeeding because of its early start and an emphasis on community, according to Jones. “We come from the industry,” he contends. “People are happy with what we can produce. They love our content so they come to learn.” Because the conference has become established, the media outlets focus on covering it, which encourages businesses to use it as a stage for introducing products or announcing mergers and acquisitions, he maintains.

Jones views LendIt and Money20/20 as the largest pure-play fintech conferences. The latter, which attracts 11,000 attendees, focuses on payments and contains a “layer” of fintech, while LendIt specializes in lending and likewise offers a “layer” of fintech, he says. Payments and lending represent the two biggest categories in fintech, so the structure of the shows makes sense, he suggests. By chance, Money20/20 occurs in the fall and LendIt takes place in spring, creating what he considers a “nice balance” that encourages prospective attendees to go to both shows.

Finovate holds a rival fintech conference that focuses more narrowly on innovation than do the LendIt and Money20/20 shows, Jones says. A competing bank securitization conference offers information on lending but doesn’t address fintech in great detail, he says.

LendIt China
Photo Credit: LendIt China

While LendIt has been coming of age in the U.S., it’s also gained siblings in Shanghai and London. The Chinese edition of the show, which made its debut in 2014, ranks as the largest fintech show in Asia. The Chinese fintech market has grown to at least five times the size of any other market in the world, and it’s home to four of the world’s five largest fintech companies, Jones says. “We were completely blown away,” he says of learning about the industry during a visit to China.

Despite the language barrier and the challenges of dealing with an unfamiliar culture, LendIt has managed to prosper in China. Through a joint venture with a local financial think tank, LendIt helped produce annual Chinese events known as the Bund Summit for two years with attendance capped at 500. For the third year, LendIt parted ways with its partner and recast the show as a larger event. After the change, the confab, now called the Lang Di Fintech Conference, attracted 1,200 attendees, making it China’s largest. “There’s a ton of future opportunity,” Jones predicts of the China endeavor. “We want to be the annual convention for the Chinese fintech industry.”

Although it’s difficult to set up operations in China, cooperation has prevailed there in at least some areas. “The government has been quite supportive,” Jones says of of Chinese officials. “They appreciate what we’re trying to do there.” In January, LendIt launched its Chinese language daily news feed.

Thousands of miles away, the European-based LendIt confab ranks second in size on that continent only to the European version of Money20/20, Jones says. Attendance at the London-based LendIt show numbered 450 in 2014, which was its initial year. It climbed to 800 in 2015 and reached 925 last year.

Putting on the European event requires much less effort than the Asian version because it’s almost an extension of the U.S. original, he says. It’s dominated by firms from the United Kingdom but draws a smattering of companies from other European nations. Crossing borders presents challenges for European fintech companies, which keeps the industry’s companies smaller there than in the U.S. and China, but that may change, he believes. “There’s a lot of innovation there, but they still have a ways to go,” he says.

LendIt Europe - Peter Renton

LendIt co-founder Peter Renton | Photo Credit: LendIt Conference

To handle its far-flung operations, LendIt relies on 20 full-time employees, 11 contractors and 10 people working in a joint venture in China for a total of 41 staff members. “These events are incredibly large shows, and we constantly feel understaffed,” Jones says. That feeling prevails despite recent additions to the staff, he notes.

And additional opportunity beckons in myriad locations. “The challenge is, do you have a bunch of conferences all over the world, or do you do a beachhead and pull people to those three events?” Jones wonders aloud when asked about the future. “For the moment, we have made the strategic decision to stick with these three events and go deeper with them. But there are so many opportunities all around the world. We’re constantly being asked to come to different countries.” Then, too, LendIt could convene smaller, one-day events around the glove as feeders to the three main conventions, he allows. “That’s something we’re batting around now.”

The established two-day conferences could also grow into three-day affairs – but not right away, Jones suggests. “We’re totally running out of time,” he says of trying to cram in all the speakers and exhibitors that LendIt would like to present. Stretching the format could create conflicts because some participants attend other events immediately before or after LendIt.

Notable LendIt speakers have included Larry Summers, who’s served as Harvard president and U.S. Treasury Secretary; Karen Mills, former administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration; John Williams, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco; and Peter Thiel, venture capitalist and member of the Trump transition team. This year, attendees can look forward to meeting the robot that represents Watson, the IBM computer. Watson will take the stage to field questions about fintech. For Jones, however, creating a conference isn’t just about the big-name speakers be they human or mechanical. “People who are lesser-known can be really fascinating,” he says.

Whoever handles the speaking duties, the LendIt Conference executives vow that they’re in it for the long run as the fintech industry’s annual convention during both boom times and economic slumps. As Jones puts it: “We want to be a reflection of our industry.”

This article is from AltFinanceDaily’s Jan/Feb 2017 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

Funding Circle announces $100 million equity investment to help thousands more small businesses globally

January 11, 2017
Article by:

Sam Hodges Funding Circle

  • Round led by Accel, with participation from other existing equity investors
  • Investment comes as UK business reached profitability for Q4 2016
  • Lending through Funding Circle passes $3 billion globally, benefitting over 25,000 businesses in the UK, US and Europe – creating more than 50,000 new jobs

Funding Circle, the world’s leading lending platform focused exclusively on small business finance, today announced it has raised a further $100 million in equity capital. Led by Accel, the round saw participation from existing Funding Circle investors, including Baillie Gifford, DST Global, Index Ventures, Ribbit Capital, Rocket Internet, Sands Capital Ventures, Temasek and Union Square Ventures.

The new investment follows significant growth at Funding Circle over the last 12 months. Globally, investors on the Funding Circle platform have lent more than $1.4 billion to small businesses in 2016, with approximately $485 million lent in Q4 alone, a record amount for any SME direct lending platform. Additionally, in Q4 Funding Circle UK recorded 90 percent year-on-year growth and reached profitability.

Samir Desai, CEO and co-founder of Funding Circle, said: “Funding Circle is changing the financial landscape for small businesses and investors globally, ensuring a better deal for everyone and helping to create a more sustainable and fairer economy. Today’s news is the next step on our journey to create a category-defining company that helps thousands of small businesses access finance and create jobs. Over the next 12 months, lending through the Funding Circle platform will create a further 50,000 new jobs, supporting economic growth in the UK, US and continental Europe.”

Funding Circle LogoFunding Circle facilitates lending to small businesses from investors including 60,000 individuals, local and national government, the European Investment Bank and financial institutions such as pension funds. The investment comes as lending to small businesses through the platform passes $3 billion globally, benefitting over 25,000 businesses and creating 50,000 new jobs.

Harry Nelis, Partner at Accel, said: “We’ve been impressed by the Funding Circle team since our early investment in the company. It has achieved significant growth across multiple international markets by delivering an appealing lending option to SMEs and attractive risk-adjusted returns to investors on the platform. This investment makes Funding Circle the largest and best capitalized SME lending platform in the world, and we’re thrilled to continue to support its journey.”

Launched in 2010, the Funding Circle model has opened up small business lending to a wide range of investors, improving competition in the market, creating jobs and reducing dependency on bank lending. This latest investment is recognition of the efficiency of the direct lending model, and its ability to channel much-needed funds to the real economy, while providing investors with attractive, stable returns. In total, Funding Circle has now raised $373 million in equity funding from some of the world’s largest and most respected investors.

By bringing together industry leading risk management and cutting edge technology, creditworthy businesses typically access the capital they need in days rather than months.

About Funding Circle

Funding Circle (www.fundingcircle.com) is the world’s leading lending platform for business loans, matching small businesses who want to borrow with investors who want to lend in the UK, US and Europe. Since launching in 2010, investors at Funding Circle – including 60,000 individuals, financial institutions, the listed Funding Circle SME Income Fund and Government – have lent more than $3 billion to 25,000 businesses globally. Approximately 10 percent of investor money now comes from Government sources, including the British Business Bank, European Investment Bank, KfW, the German government-owned development bank, and local councils across the UK. Funding Circle was the first lending platform to announce a formal referral partnership with Santander, one of the UK’s leading high street banks, and has since announced a similar partnership with RBS. It has raised $373m in equity capital from the same investors that backed Facebook, Twitter and Airbnb.

About Accel

Accel is a leading early- and growth-stage venture capital firm, powering a global community of entrepreneurs. Accel backs entrepreneurs who have what it takes to build a world-class, category-defining business. Founded in 1983, Accel brings more than three decades of experience building and supporting hundreds of companies. Accel’s vision for entrepreneurship and business enables it to identify and invest in the companies that will be responsible for the growth of next-generation industries. Accel has backed a number of iconic global platforms, which are powering new experiences for mobile consumers and the modern enterprise, including Atlassian, Avito, BlaBlaCar, Deliveroo, Dropbox, Etsy, Facebook, Flipkart, Funding Circle, Kayak, QlikTech, Simplivity, Slack, Spotify, Supercell, WorldRemit and others.

The Small Business Lender Rankings (A preliminary peek)

January 4, 2017
Article by:

Small Business Lender Rankings

Here’s a peek at how some of the industry’s largest alternative small business lenders were doing for the year in originations as they headed into the last quarter of 2016. This data should be considered an estimate and is obviously not comprehensive. Still, this should give you a clue where some players will end up:

Lender Q1 – Q3 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014
OnDeck $1,772,000,000 $1,900,000,000 $1,200,000,000
PayPal $1,000,000,000 $850,000,000
Square $550,000,000 $400,000,000 $100,000,000
IOU Financial $87,500,000 $146,400,000 $100,000,000

Other small business finance companies do more than just loans, with many doing merchant cash advances. And some companies work to get customers funded through other platforms when prospective customers don’t fit their risk box. The numbers below are origination approximations regardless of whether the customer was ultimately placed on their balance sheet or someone else’s and whether or not the transaction was a loan or MCA.

Funder Q1 – Q3 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014
Bizfi $415,000,000 $481,000,000 $277,000,000
Yellowstone Capital $350,000,000 $422,000,000 $290,000,000
Platinum Rapid Funding Group $135,000,000 $100,000,000

A Q4 To Remember – A Timeline

December 18, 2016
Article by:

This story appeared in AltFinanceDaily’s Nov/Dec 2016 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE

In case you haven’t noticed, it’s been an interesting few months for alternative finance. The below timeline is an expanded version of what appears in the print version of our Nov/Dec magazine issue.


9/27 Able Lending secured $100 million in debt financing

9/30 The FTC won a judgement of $1.3 billion against payday loan kingpin Scott Tucker, its largest ever award through litigation

10/11 The United States Court of Appeals for The District of Columbia ruled the CFPB’s organizational structure unconstitutional. To remedy, the agency will either have to convert its one-person directorship to a multi-member commission or the director will have to report to the President of the United States. The CFPB is appealing the decision.

10/13 Affirm secured $100 million in debt financing

10/14

  • CircleBack Lending was reported to have ceased lending operations
  • Goldman Sachs unveiled its new online consumer lending division, Marcus

10/20 CommonBond secured a $168 million securitization deal

10/24 Bizfi announced that John Donovan had joined the company as CEO. Donovan was the COO of Lending Club from 2007 to 2012.

10/25

  • Expansion Capital Group announced new management team. Vincent Ney, the company’s majority shareholder became the CEO
  • Lendio raised $20 million through a new equity round led by Comcast Ventures and Stereo Capital
  • Lending Club announced its foray into the $1 trillion auto refinancing market

11/1

  • Cross River Bank raised $28 million in equity led by Boston-based investment firm Battery Ventures along with Silicon Valley venture capital firms Andreessen Horowitz and Ribbit Capital
  • Square beat earnings estimates and extended $208 million through 35,000 loans in Q3

11/3

  • OnDeck announced earnings, continued use of balance sheet to fund loans and extended $613 million in Q3
  • Independent merchant cash advance training course goes live, allowing brokers and underwriters to earn a certificate

11/4 SEC concluded its investigation into Lending Club

11/7 Lending Club announced earnings and a deal to sell $1.3 billion worth of loans to a National Bank of Canada subsidiary

11/8 CFG Merchant Solutions secured a $4 million revolving line of credit

11/9 Donald Trump became the President-Elect

11/11

  • Fintech leader Peter Thiel joins the executive committee of Trump’s transition team
  • Kabbage appointed Amala Duggirala as Chief Technology Officer and Rama Rao as Chief Data Officer

11/14 Prosper’s CEO Aaron Vermut, stepped down

11/16

  • UK-based p2p lender Zopa applied for a banking license
  • Small business lender Dealstruck reportedly ceases lending operations
  • Former Lending Club CEO revealed to be launching a new rival, Credify

11/17

  • LiftForward secured a $100 million credit facility
  • Prosper filed their Q3 10-Q, revealing that they only originated $311.8 million in loans for the quarter compared to $445 million in Q2
  • The IRS sent a broad request to Coinbase, the nation’s largest bitcoin exchange, as part of a hunt for tax evaders
  • PeerStreet raised a $15 million Series A funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz

11/18 P2Bi raised $7.7 million in venture financing

11/22 LendIt announced the first ever industry awards event

11/29 Three C-level executives at CAN Capital are placed on a leave of absence after the company identified assets that were not performing as expected

12/2

  • Total Merchant Resources secures $20 million in private equity, launches wholesale funding division
  • Bitcoin-based P2P lending platform BitLendingClub shuts down
  • OCC announces they are moving forward with a special purpose national charter for fintech companies

12/8 Former CEO and co-founder of World Wrestling Entertainment tapped to run Small Business Administration

12/9 OnDeck announced new $200 million revolving credit facility with Credit Suisse

12/12 Knight Capital Funding announced new Chief Data Scientist

12/13 Fifth Third Bank is reported to buy a stake in franchise marketplace lender ApplePie Capital

12/14 BlueVine raised $49 million in Series D funding

12/15

  • Swift Capital named Tim Naughton as Chief Legal Officer
  • John MacIlwaine, Lending Club’s Chief Technology officer, submitted his resignation to the company to pursue another opportunity

12/16 CAN Capital is reported to have laid off more than 100 employees

This article is from AltFinanceDaily’s Nov/Dec 2016 magazine issue. To receive copies in print, SUBSCRIBE FREE