Should I Start an ISO With Only $2,000?
January 12, 2015A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away…
It is a period of civil war. Rebel sales reps, striking from a hidden ISO, have won their first victory against the evil Galactic Funder.
During the battle, Rebel spies managed to steal secret formulas to the Funder’s ultimate weapon, the UNDERWRITING ALGORITHM, an advanced code with enough power to destroy an entire industry.
Pursued by the Funder’s sinister sales agents, our hero races home with her flash drive, custodian of the stolen formulas that can save her merchants and restore freedom to the industry…
Breaking away to start your own ISO or brokerage in this industry used to be a rite of passage. You started somewhere, learned the ropes, then went off on your own like a Jedi Master.
The stories of reps and underwriters of years past who left their jobs to start their own ISOs are a bit nostalgic. Young twenty-somethings defying authority to plant their own flags in an industry they felt offered unlimited potential. For some, going solo was a rude awakening, a healthy taste of the real world, where you needed to be able to do more than just close the leads you’re given. But for others? Well, today they are the owners or managers of companies worth millions, tens of millions, or hundreds of millions of dollars.
Empires were built not that long ago and they certainly were not in a galaxy far, far away. But today the prospects are much bleaker. The industry has matured and certain channels are saturated. Merchant cash advance and non-bank business lending are no longer part of a young unexplored universe.
So to those that have asked me whether or not it makes sense to start an ISO in 2015, I’d have to say in many cases it does not. It’s a little late in the game. Below is one of the most popular questions posed to me over the last six months:
Q: I’m thinking about starting my own ISO. I have about $2,000 to $5,000 to spend on leads. Do you think I can do it and where should I buy the best leads from?
A: There’s a few things to address here. If you are working out of your house and your rent/mortgage is already taken care of without you having to pay yourself from your new ISO, you may be able to turn a profit starting with something this small. The first problem though is that if you’re not absolutely positive where to get excellent leads, you’re going to spend a lot of money on experimenting with multiple sources. $2,000 might be the cost of an experiment with one lead provider. In other cases, it might be $5,000. Your entire budget could get wiped out in an experiment with just one source.
There may be no barriers to entry in this business, but $2,000 to $5,000 is entirely too little to give yourself a real chance to get off the ground. Direct mail takes a lot of trial and error and thousands of dollars. Google/Bing advertising takes even more trial and error and tens of thousands of dollars before you can get really meaningful results.
And if you’re going to put all your eggs in the UCC marketing basket because of budget, it’s going to be a tough climb uphill.
The companies that do actually have the best leads don’t need a $2,000 startup ISO to sell them to. A big ISO or funder is probably already paying double the price they’re worth.
So how do you stand a chance? You should realize that the odds are you won’t.
And if you need to allocate part of that 2-5k to pay for an office and get set up like a business, you might not have anything left for marketing at all. That’s a horrible place to be!
Lastly, I have seen many ISOs try to become a broker’s broker in order to acquire deals. That means trying to close ISOs to send you deals for you to forward on to a funder as a middleman where you will get a cut if the deal closes. It’s a hustle, and if you can swing this, great, but it’s not exactly a sustainable model especially if the ISO realizes they can go direct to the funder themselves. If you can’t acquire merchants on your own (and deals you stole from the last place you worked at don’t count as acquiring on your own), then you probably shouldn’t be in the ISO business at all.
If you’re going to start an ISO in 2015, I suggest having a minimum $25,000 (50k to be safe) in marketing to start off. And if you don’t know what you’re doing, well then may the force be with you.
Lending Club IPO: The Mirage of Diversifying
September 1, 2014Behold, the fool saith, “Put not all thine eggs in the one basket” – which is but a matter of saying, “Scatter your money and your attention”; but the wise man saith, “Pull all your eggs in the one basket and – WATCH THAT BASKET.
– In Pudd’nhead Wilson by Mark Twain
Is peer-to-peer lending really offering you a chance to diversify your portfolio?
Scores of investors just like myself are jumping on the Lending Club bandwagon. The returns are sweet and the concept has mass appeal. Like a gambler getting overconfident after a long winning streak, it’s easy to get caught up in the excitement.
I have tens of thousands invested in Lending Club loans at this very moment and I think it’s time to take a breather. Other people are in deeper, six figures worth, and then there are those who are placing their entire retirement savings in the hands of everyday borrowers.
Once IRAs and 401(k)s enter the picture, the situation gets serious…
Lending Club appeals to the diversity conscious with their seven risk tiers, A,B,C,D,E,F and G. A rated loans are deemed the least risky but charge the lowest amount of interest. G rated loans carry the most risk but carry interest rates in the neighborhood of 26%.
To diversify, you could spread your funds into all of them or at least across multiple tiers. You can also make many small investments of $25 as opposed to a few investments in larger sums.
Mirage?
In an excellent Bloomberg article, Matt Levine explains that investors on Lending Club’s platform are not really making loans to consumers, Lending Club’s bank is. They sell the loan to Lending Club and Lending Club creates a note and sells it to you. The borrowers owe Lending Club money and Lending Club owes you money. Your relationship is with Lending Club, not the borrowers, and therefore the entirety of your investments however seemingly diversified, are really in Lending Club itself.
A few months ago I wondered if it made sense to buy Lending Club stock over buying their notes.
The note prospectus explains “the Notes are unsecured and holders of the Notes do not have a security interest in the corresponding Loan or the proceeds of the corresponding Loan.” This means these loans are not collateral if Lending Club goes south.
If the company were to file for bankruptcy, you would need to add yourself to the list of unsecured creditors. As stated, “if LendingClub were to become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the holder of a Note will have a general unsecured claim against LendingClub that may or may not be limited in recovery to borrower payments in respect of the corresponding member loan.”
Unsecured note holders are still better off than common shareholders in the event of a bankruptcy, but that assumes that the borrowers are still paying their loans.
What if they weren’t? Or worse yet, what if they didn’t have to pay them?
One basket
Lending Club’s S-1 warns of major dangers. “Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the loans facilitated through our platform if we were re-characterized as a lender, and the loans could be voidable or unenforceable,” it says. “In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators.”
If Lending Club is at some point re-characterized, your portfolio would be killed off instantly. Your eggs however well diversified are in the Lending Club basket. Such a situation happened in a closely related industry where a merchant cash advance company was challenged to be a lender in disguise. In 2008, a class action lawsuit was brought against AdvanceMe Inc in California. The case was settled but AdvanceMe could no longer collect payments and they actually had to give a lot of the money they had already collected back.
In a Lending Club nightmare scenario, note holders could potentially be forced to forfeit any principal and interest they’ve already collected in the event of a harsh judgment or settlement. If Lending Club is only obligated to pay what’s collected to note holders, then what if they’re told give it all back to the borrowers? It’s a nightmare scenario indeed.
Sleep tight
If the goal is to invest in consumer loans, you should spread your investments around. Put some in Lending Club, some in Prosper (their #1 competitor), and at least another. More importantly, don’t invest all of your money in peer-to-peer lending companies or consumers loans as this is not diversifying either. Peer-to-peer lending should be just one component of your overall investment strategy. Stocks, bonds, CDs, and even FDIC insured savings accounts should round out your holdings.
The Lending Club IRA and 401(k) program is wildly risky at best. Would you invest a significant portion of your retirement savings in the hands of just one company? I considered it for a second…
And then I took a deep breath.
The Lending Club IPO has been labeled an awareness event. Millions of people will be learning about it for the first time through the publicity of a stock offering. If you do decide to put some eggs in, WATCH THAT BASKET!
AmeriMerchant’s CEO David Goldin shared his own thoughts on the IPO on Bloomberg TV:
































