Merchant Cash Advance Diminished by Growth of Payment Technologies
May 15, 2011
Technology will be the end of us all
When bank lending dried up, Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) providers fulfilled the need to keep America’s small business owners going strong. By withholding a percentage of each credit/debit card sale automatically, there was no need to worry about a client’s ability to make payments. Without the risk of late payers or non-payers, MCA providers singlehandedly eradicated credit score from the underwriting guidelines. Or so they thought.
Only a small percentage of businesses in default actually close their doors. Circumventing the MCA provider’s merchant processor or incentivizing customers to pay with cash are issues that have plagued the industry for years. While this would constitute a clear breach in the sale of one’s future receivables, it’s not always a deliberate act of malice. However, there is a direct correlation between the frequency of breaches and *surprise* declining credit score.
But in the instances without malice, such as if damaged POS equipment prevents the flow of processing, there’s not much a MCA provider can do other than help fix it. These gaps in collection affect the bottom line and lead to upward pressure on costs or tighter restrictions on approval, two outcomes that nobody wants.
And as if there already wasn’t a strain, changes in payment technology are quickly eroding the MCA industry’s turf. The credit/debit card sales of a business aren’t exactly limited to one of these:

Now there are options, lots of them. In today’s world you can accept electronic payments with almost anything, a conundrum for MCA providers aiming to collect a percentage of all of it. And how about those routine PCI compliance upgrades? There are countless businesses with a basement full of old credit card machines that could be plugged back in, put back into service, and freely used to circumvent their financial obligations.
Take this clothing retailer for example. She qualified for an advance of only $5,000 but when it came time to convert the merchant account, the process wasn’t so easy:

Nearly all of the transactions conducted inside the store happen through the touch screen POS. The merchant statements reflect consistent historical sales of nearly $4,800 per month, instilling the belief that the future won’t be much different. But when the customer lines get too long, there’s a backup credit card terminal that they pull out from under the counter that still has an active account with a previous processor. Around the holidays, they dig out the old Tranz model terminals from the basement and use them too. For street fairs and trade shows, they attach their Square to their iPhone and process on the go. And when it comes to their website and Ebay, PayPal is their preferred method of payment.
This doesn’t mean the touch screen POS won’t continue to see $4,800 worth of action per month, but the situation doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence if the goal is to collect a percentage of their credit/debit card sales. What if they occasionally use Square inside the store? What if phone orders are punched into PayPal? These things may happen inadvertently or simply because their customers demand it.
To firmly secure a purchase of future sales, the MCA provider would need to do the following:
- Convert the touch screen POS system (which will very likely come with a fee from the POS reseller)
- Reprogram their backup terminal
- Reprogram all the old terminals collecting dust in the basement
- Force the return of the Square and replace it with their own iPhone processing attachment
- Delete PayPal from the HTML of the business’s website
- Instruct them to stop conducting business on Ebay
- Cancel the PayPal account altogether and replace with an authorize.net virtual interface or something equivalent

That’s a lot of effort for $5,000 but doing anything less is a gamble. That’s another reason why MCAs are more expensive than bank loans. Without set fixed payments, they are extremely vulnerable to economic ups and downs and now the explosion of payment alternatives.
Rather than stay ahead, the industry is becoming more fractured as evident by the rise of new funding sources such as Kabbage, that lends against future PayPal sales. It’s innovative but vulnerable. Kabbage depends on the success and status quo of PayPal for survival, a characteristic that is not likely to carry them far. Similarly, MCA providers are dependent on withholding a percentage of future sales, an uneasy task in a world where the point of sale itself is changing.
Innovation in the MCA space has gone as far as automated bank debits and a lockbox. One depends on the merchant’s use of a single bank account and the other is equally exposed to the issues we’ve discussed.
Which of course begs the question: If electronic payments are becoming more elusive to capture, how can the MCA industry survive? The obvious answer is to transform the product itself into a loan. Secure it against collateral and have the credit bureaus at your disposal. Breaches will become far less likely and electronic payments less elusive when there are actual consequences involved. It’s a dreaded word and one MCA representatives have spent years avoiding, but according to the state of California, it’s probably a loan already anyway.
As MCA providers struggle to keep up with payment alternatives, banks are wondering when we’ll all wake up from the “it’s not a loan” euphoria. If the goal is to provide capital and get more back, reprogramming a terminal isn’t going to cut it. How many free hours can America Online offer to bring people back to their dialup internet service? Technology changed and the age of AOL ended. So too may the age of Merchant Cash Advance…. at least in its current form.
– The Merchant Cash Advance Resource
Merchant Cash Advance Outlook for 2011
January 2, 2011
Happy New Year! Over the past few weeks we spoke with many Merchant Cash Advance(MCA) industry professionals, read blogs, and scanned forums to find out what is predicted for 2011. Here is what we learned:
—————————-
The number of businesses facing tax liens will rise, making it increasingly difficult for them to obtain a traditional MCA. Their only resort may be “starter” or “decline” programs, which come with low capital and high costs.
Credit card processors(CCPs) will venture into funding their own clients. Over the past few years, CCPs were a necessary third party to a MCA transaction. The CCP would split the business’s batch to allow the MCA provider to collect on their purchased receivables. Their years as a third party have granted them incredible insight into the funding business. In the latter half of 2010, some CCPs tested the waters and funded businesses on their own. In 2011, we will begin to see the role of MCA provider and CCP gradually merge into solitary entities.
Resellers of MCA began to drift away from their dependence on funding providers in 2010. In 2011, there will be a surge in the number of resellers funding businesses on their own. The MCA industry will become largely decentralized and may give rise to new challenges.
Decentralization will lead to greater competition and create downward pressure on costs. Businesses stand to benefit by the likely trend of decreasing retrieval rates and factor rates.
Businesses hanging on by a thread are less likely to obtain funds in 2011. Bank loans were never meant as a means to stave off bankruptcy and neither is a MCA. Most detractors of the MCA industry were business owners on the verge of bankruptcy before obtaining capital. This is not a lifeline. Good businesses grow, bad businesses fail. That’s the way it has to work in order for the economy and capitalism to be functional.
The Federal Reserve’s 12 cent debit fee cap may negatively impact resellers that depend on merchant residuals.
The MCA industry will continue to use less expensive means of marketing. Expensive regional trade shows are becoming less popular and UCC hunting is on the rise.
—————————-

2011 is yet to be told. One thing is for sure, MCA providers are not unlike the businesses they fund. It’s a tumultuous economy and there is no guarantee that we’ll all still be standing in 2012. Remember those who have come before us (look at the bottom of this page). Much luck to all!
-AltFinanceDaily
P2P Merchant Cash Advance Model Already Exists
December 23, 2010Posted on December 23, 2010 at 6:02 PM
Just a few weeks ago, we covered a story on how the Merchant Cash Advance(MCA) industry was evolving towards the Peer 2 Peer Lending Model. Apparently we were very right. We envisioned a future live marketplace that resembles Prosper.com and today discovered the closest thing so far: the Colonial Funding Network(CFN). http://www.colonialmgmt.biz/ready.html. Our site authors have no connection to CFN and we hope this reivew is not received as a gimmicky advertisement.
So why is CFN a highly evolved Merchant Cash Advance marketplace?
• You(meaning anyone) can pick the business to fund
• You can put up the capital
• You can contribute just a part of the capital
• You can have control over the funding terms
• You don’t do the underwriting
• The pay back and setup is serviced by the market maker (Strategic Funding Source)
• Businesses have already been funded using this model
An excerpt from their site:
“Ready to be a player? Take advantage of our world class capabilities! Colonial Funding Network is the answer for you. You find the merchant, invest the cash, and Colonial Funding does the rest.
Colonial will handle every detail of fulfilling and managing your merchant cash advance. From providing underwriting data, to administration… including filings, bookkeeping,reporting and disbursements… we do it all. Through our state-of-the-art Merchant Funding web portal, you’ll have real-time information on your clients… anytime you want it!”
Sounds very much like P2P is already staking its claim in the Merchant Cash Advance world. I wonder how far it will go….
AltFinanceDaily
The Direct Funder Model is Sooo 2009
December 1, 2010Originally posted on Dec. 1, 2010
We touched on this in a previous post and think it’s important to expand on it. The Merchant Cash Advance industry has evolved over the last several years. The clear line between Broker and Funder is becoming incredibly blurred.
Many Direct Funding companies are now offering brokers the opportunity to contribute their own funds towards an advance and share in the profits(And the risk!). On the same token, many big name brokers seem to have filed a handful of UCCs as a secured party, an indication that they have funded accounts all by themselves.
Some industry vets have taken things to another level and are calling on multiple parties to share in a single advance. For example: A broker contacts several other brokers/funders and requests if they want to all chip in. One firm usually takes the lead and services the account to reap a management fee. This collaborative group financing acts like a mini hedge fund but we believe this signals an evolutionary move towards the Peer 2 Peer(P2P) Lending model. In essence a P2B model that looks like this:

This is an an altered picture of the Prosper.com P2P Lending Site.
Prosper boasts of having funded $210,000,000 since their inception. The Merchant Cash Advance industry has put out more than that in just the previous 6 months. So the concept is similar and it fits the mold. Merchants submit documents and an application to a P2B Network. The Network posts the business profile, processing history, personal credit score, reference information, and publicize it on the site. Anyone can then peruse businesses and choose which to contribute funds towards. Once the total advance amount that the P2B Network recommends has been raised, the P2B Network converts the processing, transfers funds to the merchant, and maintains the account for a fee.
While we don’t anticipate the entire industry to convert to this model, nor do we predict if it will actually work, this will inevitably become a segment of the market. The Merchant Cash Advance industry received much criticism back in 2007 and 2008 but the tone has changed dramatically. The phrase “banks aren’t lending” is so worn out that people should be fined for saying it. Self regulating industry practices, the recent mass exodus of devilish sales brokerages, and the banking problem, have not only brought the Merchant Cash Advance industry legitimacy but also made it one of the preferred and most credible funding options available to small business.
A P2B network could do all of the underwriting, complete with a final say on approvals or they could present a business as is and allow everyone in America to be their own underwriter and make the determination themselves. How tempting would be it to invest $100 to a business in your community and buy a percentage of their future credit card sales? We like the concept and the industry is halfway there. Who’s going to start this first?
– An Opinion by the Merchant Cash Advance Resource
../../merchantcashadvanceresource.htm
============
UPDATE 12/23: P2P MARKETPLACE FOR MERCHANT CASH ADVANCE FOUND ALREADY TO EXIST, READ HERE
Merchant Cash Advance Blacklist
August 5, 2010If you default on a Merchant Cash Advance naturally or by breach of contract, there is virtually no chance you will be able to obtain a Merchant Cash Advance in the future. 2008 was a particularly brutal year for Merchant Cash Advance firms. Not only had the recession weakened the most aggressive players but merchant fraud was abundant. 90% of the time this business is conducted by phone. Being vastly easier to obtain than a loan, many merchants rigged the process to get funding from multiple firms at the same time. Some would “go out of business” only to obtain more funds under a different name.
Merchant Cash Advance providers have stuck by their mantra of providing a simple process to their clients and have created solutions to prevent fraud. Industry groups such as the North American Merchant Advance Association provide a live database exchange of clients in default. A merchant’s most sensitive information is not revealed but public information such as legal name, dba, owner name, business address, and phone numbers (to name a few) are all stored in the database. Live funding activity is also shared in some capacity. For instance, if you apply to funding firm A and funding firm B at the same time but are funded by firm A today, then Firm B will automatically be alerted not to fund you.
These deterrents and live databases are not broadcast to the public and thus some businesses try to obtain additional advances after having defaulted on one already. If you are a merchant and you are trying to hide the fact that you currently have an advance or defaulted on one previously, you will not be successful in obtaining funds from another firm.
How Did Merchant Cash Advance Companies Get My Information?
August 4, 2010I used a Merchant Cash Advance program and now I am being solicited because of it. How did these companies get my information?
The Merchant Cash Advance industry is a competitive business. Most firms file a UCC-1 (public notice with your secretary of state) on your business to let potential creditors, lawyers, and other Merchant Cash Advance firms know your future credit card receivables have been purchased. This is customary for a loan as well, although the language in the filing is different.
Since this information is public, it is possible to request a list of all UCC-1’s filed by a particular funding company from the states. Each UCC-1 includes the DBA, Business Address, and Date it was filed. Computer programs or manual google searches can fill in the blanks and obtain the owner’s name and business phone number.
In just a few minutes, a competing Merchant Cash Advance firm or reseller can determine when you received funding and where you got it from. For the competition, It’s a free, easy way to create a marketing list.
The same can be done for traditional loans and equipment leases.
An Underwriter in Salesman’s Clothing
April 1, 2009
It was mid-2006 and AdvanceMe was finding it wasn’t so alone in the world anymore. First Funds, Amerimerchant, Merchant Cash and Capital, BFS, among others were abuzz with a business model and a dream. Practically fresh out of college I joined one of the few funding companies as an underwriter. For a kid with little experience in an industry where no one had experience, I was fortunate to have graduated from a great business school. I had held off pursuing a CPA to see where the Merchant Advance wave would take me.
After my first week, I was hooked. Merchant processing, purchasing future receivables, private investors, and millions of dollars being pumped into small businesses were all part of an average day. After a month, I had complete sign-off ability to approve an account and wire funds out. “Fascinating,” I thought.
“3 Merchant processing statements and a signed contract.” This was the industry wide standard documentation at the time. If one Cash Provider wanted more documentation than that, the ISOs could divert their business to another Cash Provider in defiance. Cash Providers spent a lot of time courting and tending to the needs of their ISOs. It was truly a day when salesmen ran the Merchant Advance world.
I remember visiting giant telemarketing centers with 50-100 people spreading the word about the Merchant Advance to thousands of people a day. At one in particular, there was a legendary ex-stock broker at the front of the room rallying the troops on a megaphone. “Sell! Sell! Sell!” The Team Captains had their names up on giant marker board with their stats for the month. Combined, they were at $2 Million in sales so far.
After I had done my “courting” and “tending” to the brass of these sales warriors, I saw a 21-year old salesman being written a check for $20,000 for a sales benchmark he had just hit. Rumor had it that he was a pizza delivery guy living out of his car just 6 weeks before. I wondered how people were making THAT much money. It was hard not to be caught up in the commotion and excitement. Nobody knew when the growth of this product would stop exploding. It wasn’t long after that when one of my fellow underwriters resigned to get in the action. I didn’t blame him, but it just wasn’t for me. I was an analytical type guy, not the sales type.
I spent my days of 2007 learning and dealing with the fact that small businesses were taking Advances simultaneously, huge commissions were paid for deals that were defaulting, 10% Closing fees were being charged, and new terminals were being sent to merchants that provided them with the opportunity to divert sales away from the Cash Providers.
This was all happening while ISOs/Providers were quadrupling their staff to deal with the surge in applications. Too much was happening at once. There were situations where Cash Providers became so overburdened and technologically unprepared, that it would take weeks just to determine what a merchant owed on their Advance. That’s not a good position to be in.
In all the madness, our team of underwriters were ahead of the game. There were alarming trends that spelled disaster. We believed the sales model had gone awry. It was $10,000 for $13,500 for our company, a profit of $3,500. It was 10% Commission + 10% closing cost + increased merchant processing rates + terminal leases, a profit of $2,000+ for the sales company. That was way too much for having no liability. There was no way these additional fees could be tacked on to what could already be considered our expensive product.
I eventually became Manager of the entire underwriting department on my platform of conservative underwriting. Boy, was I unpopular. I found myself butting heads with salesmen all day. I lobbied for more documentation and the elimination of closing costs.
What I especially subconsciously disliked, was that some Advance salesmen my age were earning 4x more than I was annually and I considered myself to be earning a hefty sum. They would debate constantly about declines and make excuses for required paperwork their merchants couldn’t produce. It was a rule that no matter how terrible the submitted application and paperwork looked, a full workup and discussion of the deal with the salesman would be had. For certain submissions, this just didn’t seem to make sense. To the salesman who worked hard for the application, it meant the world to him.
Some of us thought their over-ambitious tactics and need for closing costs were the result of greed. “A bunch of fat cat brokers”, some of us would think. Sure, there were the guys out there making $30,000 in a month, but a lot of the day-to-day calls were from guys only making 1.5% on the Advance amount, only a portion of the closing cost, and had no idea what bankcard residuals were.
It didn’t faze me when a salesman pleaded that he had been pitching a particular merchant for over 3 months and the excuse for why his May processing statement was missing. “No statement, no funding,” I asserted. Rules were rules and I would not put up with someone trying to circumvent them. The merchant probably would’ve been just fine too.
Our underwriting group took a lot of heat from the Execs at our company. Conservative underwriting jeopardized demand. It was a terrible cost-benefit debacle that we faced day in and day out. Sounds similar to the mortgage broker/ bank dilemma eh?
FAST FORWARD……
It was late Summer, 2008. Our company was stable and in good hands. I basked in our accomplishment. Some of our competitors hadn’t been so lucky. Like the friend of mine who left before me over a year before, I wanted in on the action. I resigned and became a salesman.
I never wanted to manage an ISO, I wanted to be a salesman on the front lines. I wanted the ringing phones, the commotion, the marker boards with stats, the glory, the $20,000 checks.
I became an Advance salesman at the worst time in history. Fast Capital had long gone, Merit left the arena, and some of the good ‘ol boys had changed to renewals only. Submitted applications were responded to by computer programs saying my deal was ‘automatically declined due to something or other” and would not even be reviewed. “How could my deal not get reviewed? I spent 30 days pitching this merchant only to find out he wasn’t even worthy of review?” My subsequent calls were met by agitated voices at Cash Providers who couldn’t comprehend why I wanted to know the status only 2 days after I submitted the application.
I shrugged it off in the beginning. In fact I found myself not even submitting a large chunk of the applications I generated because they didn’t look like approval material. That was the underwriter in me. I learned it to be a harmful habit.
It was 10 straight declined deals later that I found myself wondering if I should submit everything I get just to make something happen. I extended the streak to 15 declines and my subsequent phone calls to Cash Providers were met with cold responses about Policy, Policy, Policy. “No Statement, No funding,” I was told. My argument that my merchant could not provide his November merchant statement went unheard. They could not understand why I was trying to circumvent rules. I wasn’t. The streak was extended to 20 declined deals. “Under 500 FICO, too many NSFs, landlord reference insufficient, volume under $5,000, etc.” Some would suggest certain marketing campaigns produce low quality merchants. Maybe, maybe not.
The streak was extended to 25 declined deals and a merchant I had been pitching for literally 4 months was finally giving me a shot. The sweat, the stress, and the dwindling commission paychecks led to the addition of a 2% closing cost on the deal. The merchant ok’d it and signed my form. My stats on the marker board were pathetic and I was far from glory. What happened next is ironic.
The Cash Provider got wind of the closing cost and called our office. Something was said about greed and overburdening their merchant. A warning was issued and they were going to watch my submissions more closely. 25 straight declined submissions done via a computer program e-mailing me a notice of decline with no human discussion, 4 months of sweat in closing a deal, and only a quarter of that 2% closing cost actually going into my pocket. That’s pre-tax by the way. Now I’m on their watch list.
I’ve got to appreciate the irony of it all. I understand where the Cash Providers are coming from. I’ve seen it through their eyes. The power is back in the Cash Providers hands but it has become too much so.
With restrictions so tight, our collective target merchant has relatively good credit, money in the bank, current with all their vendors and rent, consistent processing, sufficient gross sales, and be able to submit a large amount of paperwork. These merchants are harder to come by and many of the amateur salesmen will not be able to close someone like that. Ironically, I personally obtained a credit card last week with 0% APR for 12 months with a $20,000 limit. I submitted no documents and spoke to no one. All I did was fill in my info online.
Cash Providers charge an $8,000 fee for $20,000 and we all know the hoops the applicants have to jump through to get there. Interesting. Makes me think 1.40 factor rates will not last forever regardless of any credit crisis.
The Cash Providers that brag, “We have ISOs that submit 10 deals a month and get 10 approvals” should realize they surely generated way more applications than that. They just sent the ones they knew you would approve. Marketing and overhead costs were incurred on all of them.
Many are shouting that only the strong will survive in this new world order of Merchant Advances. I think lending will free up again one day and all the Cash Providers that think providing ISO support means having a computer program spit out automated response e-mails and a toll free number that no one of decision making capacity answers will find themselves alone. There should be a bit more “courting” and “tending” to the ISO’s needs. They need you badly right now and you can’t live without them.
Perhaps I’m just ahead of the game again. Maybe I should apply for an underwriting job.





























