Windset Capital Winding Down
September 18, 2016
An email sent out on Friday by Paul Phillips, announced that Riverton, UT-based Windset Capital will be winding down their funding operations this week. Phillips is the company’s business development manager.
“Windset will no longer accept new loan applications effective Monday, September 26, 2016. Windset will complete and fund all open and valid approvals and will continue to service all of the loans in its portfolio, for the entire duration of their terms.”
Phillips’ email explains a hard truth. “In our opinion the working capital loan market has become unhealthy, reflecting current and trending competitive patterns that we believe no longer maintains an acceptable balance between risk and pricing,” he says. “In addition, as an organization, we have multiple growth opportunities in our equipment finance businesses that are more compelling.”
Windset launched in in 2013 with the idea that they could provide businesses with at least two years in business with working capital loans up to $250,000.
“After three years of serving the short-term working capital market and dedicating 100% of Windset’s resources to the broker/ISO community, we have made the strategic decision to exit the working capital loan market and focus solely on our growing equipment finance businesses.” said Barry Shafran, Chesswood’s President and CEO.
Winset is owned by Chesswood Group Limited, whose portfolio of companies includes the notable Pawnee Leasing.
“While we have continued to manage Windset profitably, our longer term outlook on the changing fundamentals of the working capital loan market have made us uncomfortable with the risk-return profile. We appreciate the many relationships we have made since 2013 and we will continue to fund all of our partners’ approved applications,” said Windset and Pawnee Leasing President Gary Souverein.
Why The Quiet Summer Was a Good Thing for ‘Marketplace Lending’
September 11, 2016
A lackluster April turned into an explosive May. And then… well it got kind of quiet there for a bit as loan origination volumes for some lenders dropped.
A lot of theories have been challenged, a lot of absolutes shaken. Like given the choice between a short term loan at a high interest rate and a long term loan at a low interest rate, which one would a small business choose? A lot of lenders raised money on the belief that businesses would choose the latter, bolstered by a compelling argument that it is “better” for their well-being. But businesses are not neatly packaged entities with uniform interests, strategies and situations. It’s not uncommon for small businesses to choose both options. Simultaneously. Two loans. To serve different purposes.
And so what then? I believe to some extent the concept of algorithms with thousands of data points, yelp reviews and the rest of it are being challenged by basic scenarios such as what happens to performance models if the customer takes on more debt after the initial loan?
Why do many consumer borrowers that claim to be consolidating their debt end up more in debt? Maybe the lenders themselves expected this but it conflicts with the message that was being told to the outside world for a long time about what made these products so special, that borrowers were consolidating their high interest debt to lower rate loans that was all made possible thanks to the low cost required to operate an online lender fueled by revolutionary new algorithms.
Even the underlying low cost premise to operate is being challenged. Why are low cost lenders often wildly unprofitable if their secret sauce is supposedly the low cost of being a nonbank online lender?
The problem is that some stories sound great on paper but don’t work out exactly as planned in the real world.
Even the concept of peer-to-peer lending and to some degree the marketplace has transformed or been phased out. Marketplace lending as the term is survived by today is typically Wall Street institutions providing capital to nonbank lenders. There is no real marketplace, at least not for the little guy anymore.
All of these discoveries and evolutions are a good thing. Too many experiments being conducted in the market at the same time created chaos. Failures, slowdowns, and adjustments are a positive step toward a sustainable future. How could a lender reasonably rely on its performance models when every day some new company was opening up and pulverizing the market with billions of dollars of marketing and loans based on some untested unprofitable system?
It’s no wonder that like twenty trade groups formed this year alone. Regulators and legislators looking out into the world of fintech probably saw and still on some levels see a tornado of disruptive confusion.
“Are you guys one of those crowdfunding marketplace bitcoin cash advance peer-to-peer lending companies I’ve been reading about? We need to regulate you.”
They need help to sort through it all and fast.
The FDIC, for example, humorously defined marketplace lending as basically every kind of lending there is, from auto loans to merchant cash advance to medical patient financing to real estate lending. The industry became everything and as everything it’s essentially nothing.
And so the quiet summer months, though not totally dead, were much needed. Hopefully everybody has gotten a chance to breathe and can now continue the work they set out to do and truly provide sustainable value to the economic system.
Bring on Fall!
HK Marketplace Lender WeLab Secures $25 Million Credit Facility from ING Bank
September 6, 2016
ING Bank upped its investment in Hong Kong marketplace lender WeLab with a credit facility of $25 million.
This follows a $160 million Series B round in the mobile and online lending company led by ING and Khazanah Nasional Bank. Founded in 2013, WeLab operates Wolaidai, a Chinese mobile lending platform for loans ranging from $50- $500 and WeLend, a P2P lending site in Hong Kong which has processed over $4 billion in loans since inception.
In the near future, the company wants to tap into the bank loan market to raise an additional $50 million and make a foray into the insurance market.
“We believe this credit facility is one of the first completed by a major bank to fund the portfolio growth of a fintech company in Asia and are confident that this will open more doors to institutional funding in the near future,” WeLab founder and CEO Simon Loong told DealStreet Asia.
The firm is backed by investors including Sequoia Capital, Yuri Milner and Guangdong Technology Financial Group. WeLend was launched as a social lending platform targeting debt consolidators and small businesses for loans up to $20,000 for two years. With the Chinese P2P market poised to take over 9 percent of total retail loans by 2018 and high fintech adoption (29 percent digital users) in Hong Kong, will this be the first of many such bets?
Alternative Financing Group’s Owner Indicted
September 6, 2016
Investors who thought their money was being used to fund small business loans didn’t get what they wanted, according to the SunHerald. Thomas “Lenny” Lepre, whose company Alternative Financing Group offers business loans and merchant cash advances was indicted on five counts of wire fraud on August 23rd for spending money on himself that was supposed to be used to make loans.
According to the indictment filed in the Southern District of Mississippi, Lepre “made materially false and fraudulent representations and solicited significant sums of money from investors and clients purportedly for funding of commercial services to borrowing clients, and for investments, and converted his investors and client borrowers’ monies to his own use and possession, using the funds inconsistently with the representations he had made to the investors and clients.”
The prosecution seeks a criminal forfeiture of more than $500,000. His arraignment is set for September 22nd.
Lepre is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The case number is 1:16-cr-00061-HSO-JCG.
The Empty Loan Marketplace – Lending Club Zero?
September 2, 2016Update: 9/2/16 – At 1 PM, Lending Club uploaded a batch of 600+ loans on to the platform.
Update: 9/3/16 – The only notes available on the platform today are C-grade notes. No A,B,D,E,F,G…
The leader in marketplace lending is showing ZERO available notes in its retail marketplace, according to a screenshot captured of Lending Club this morning. This indicates that Lending Club either hasn’t uploaded its latest batch or that no loans are currently being allocated to retail investors. It doesn’t mean that the company isn’t lending.

PeerCube, which tracks the amount of new and total loans on the Lending Club platform, also shows zero availability over the span of several hours.
Even if it’s a technical issue, Lending Club’s purported 135,000 self-managed active individual investors will be sure to notice that the marketplace is currently out of stock.
PeerCube also shows that there were 27% fewer loans listed on the retail marketplace in August than in July.

Meanwhile, a thread started on the LendAcademy forum where many Lending Club retail investors hang out, shows users discussing a dearth of new loans going back to July 22nd. Anil Gupta, who runs PeerCube, said in the thread that Lending Club had recently stopped releasing new loans to the retail platform on weekends.
Lending Club has not yet responded to an email sent to them inquiring about the zero note availability, but recently company CEO Scott Sanborn reassured investors that they were committed to the marketplace.
Some of our investors have observed the funding environment and asked: “Are you going to become a balance sheet lender, just like a regular bank? Has Lending Club’s business model changed?”
Let me be very clear: Lending Club is committed to the marketplace model and we do not plan to become a balance sheet or “hybrid” lender. Our mission of connecting borrowers and investors has not changed.
– Scott Sanborn, in an email on 7/28/16
On August 4th, Bloomberg reported that Lending Club was in talks with Western Asset Management Co. to set up a fund that would purchase as much as $1.5 billion of loans over time. Institutions like these may be responsible for the periodic lack of notes made available to the retail market.
Letter From The Editor – Sept/Oct 2016
September 1, 2016What is marketplace lending? Lately it’s been looking more and more like Wall Street and banking. Goldman Sachs is now playing a more prominent role in the space while the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is considering a limited-charter framework, which would make the non-bank lenders more bank-like. Not to mention that things like securitizations, bond ratings and vintage performance are dominating news headlines. It all sounds very Wall Street indeed.
But while a segment of the industry looks to effectively merge back into the traditional banking system [ I suppose they are becoming “reBanked” 😉 ], there’s another segment chugging along just fine without the banks and we write with you in mind.
To that end, we asked, what are the challenges with funding merchants in Puerto Rico? Is it okay to fund marijuana-based businesses in states where it’s legal? And what’s the latest challenge to affect telemarketing efforts?
Maybe you are surprised to hear that telemarketing even has a place in the world of fintech especially since the media hype over the last few years has imagined an online-only Internet utopia where all lending happens in the cloud. Meanwhile, millions upon millions of dollars of transactions start with a guy or gal and a cold call.
There are rules, of course. You can’t just call anybody using whatever means you want and some people on the receiving end of those phone calls know that. Woe betide you who calls the wrong person the wrong way, our research discovered. The TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act) is creating another burdensome layer of cost and some of the tactics being employed to extract penalties warrant close attention. It might not be future regulations that cause problems but existing ones. In this issue, we’ll show you why smiling and dialing do not always go hand in hand.
IT’S A BROKER’S WORLD
August 31, 2016
From east to west, small businesses are getting funded. But how they’re found and who they work with depends on where they are. In the US, where brokers tend to have a love/hate relationship with the funding companies they work with, they are no doubt a driving force in the market. In other countries, they might not even exist, are just starting to bloom or they add balance to a mature market. Is the world built for brokers? AltFinanceDaily traveled far and wide to find the answers.
Down under in Australia where American-based merchant cash advance and lending companies have expanded, the ISO (which stands for Independent Sales Office and is synonymous with broker) model has not really followed. David Goldin, CEO of Capify, an international company headquartered in New York, told AltFinanceDaily that there’s very few ISOs in Australia.
He believes that’s because there’s next to no payment processing ISO market there, a foundation that was a major precursor in the US towards the development of ISOs reselling merchant cash advances and business loans.
Luke Schmille, President of CapRock Services, echoed same. The Dallas-based company founded Sprout Funding in Australia earlier this summer as part of a joint venture with Sydney-based family office Huntwick Holdings. “Direct marketing is the primary method [of acquiring deal flow],” he said. “The credit card processing space is controlled by several large banks, so you don’t see ISO efforts in the acquiring space either.”
Big bank dominance was only one reason why another country’s emerging alternative small business funding market developed slowly. In Hong Kong, non-bank alternatives like merchant cash advances faced legal uncertainty for a long time. For example, Global Merchant Funding (GMF), once the only merchant cash advance company in the Chinese special administrative region, had been relentlessly pursued for years by the Secretary for Justice for conducting business as a money lender without a license. GMF fought it. And won.
In May of this year, the legality of merchant cash advances ultimately prevailed after the highest court ruled the agreements were not loans. Emboldened, several companies have stepped up their marketing of the product. But whether they’re doing daily debit loans or split-processing merchant cash advances (both of which exist there), marketing tends to be directed at merchants, not a middle market of brokers.
Gabriel Chung of Hong Kong-based Advanced Express Capital said that there are a handful of large brokers typically comprised of former bankers, but the rest of the broker market is highly fragmented, mostly made up of individual freelancers.
Adrian Cook, the Founder and CEO of Hong Kong-based Asia Capital Advance, agreed that marketing is usually aimed at merchants directly but that it’s changing. “Since the market is still very new and MCA is only beginning to gain popularity, brokers on the market are only starting to recognize MCA,” he said. “There is a lot of room for the brokerage market to grow.”
In the UK, where Capify also operates, CEO David Goldin explained that the UK doesn’t have a lot of credit card processing ISOs so there wasn’t a major migration from that business to MCA like there was in the US. But that doesn’t mean there is no middleman market at all.
Paul Mildenstein, executive director of London-based Liberis, said that brokers are an important channel, but not as dominant as they are in the US. “Our brokers are usually members of the NACFB, an organisation in the UK that actively supports and provides operating principles to the furtherance of the commercial finance broker community,” he wrote. The National Association of Commercial Finance Brokers claims to have 1600 members, one among them is Liberis.
“Many clients want the support of an experienced professional who can discuss the financial options available to them in their specific circumstances,” said Liberis’ CEO, Rob Straathof. “Given relatively low awareness of the Business Cash Advance product in the UK, this means that brokers have a key role to play in educating potential customers on when this is the right option for them,” he added.
Straathof stressed a robust criteria for the brokers they work with and explained that brokers are their eyes and ears in the market. “The relationships we have with them are not transactional, but transformational for our business,” he said.
The NACFB was also praised by Alexander Littner, Managing Director of Chelmsford, Essex-based Boost Capital. The company, which is actually a subsidiary of Coral Springs, FL-based BFS Capital in the US, sees a balance between their use of brokers and their efforts to acquire customers directly.
“As the alternative finance market is still relatively new here in the UK these brokers are important for this independent advice, and to help educate the market and establish trust,” Littner said. “At Boost Capital we work very closely with brokers across the UK, they are a critical part of our growth and fundamental to our ongoing success.”
In the US, brokers play such a dominant role in customer acquisition that some MCA funding companies rely on them to source the entirety of their business. Back in February, Jordan Feinstein of NY-based Nulook Capital told AltFinanceDaily, “We decided that the best way to grow is to build relationships to avoid the overhead, compliance, training and manpower that a sales team would require.” Nulook markets its broker-only approach as a strength.
Others take a more blended approach, like Justin Bakes, CEO of Forward Financing, for example. “While our priority is to self originate, it is essential to create and maintain partnerships in this business,” he said earlier this year.
Notably, no such guiding authority like the UK’s NACFB exists for brokers in the US so it’s not easy to track exactly how many there are or how they operate, but their role in the industry cannot be understated. AltFinanceDaily actually labeled 2015 The Year Of The Broker, when it published an article in its March/April 2015 issue that tried to capture the essence of the industry at the time. Tom McGovern, who was then a VP at Cypress Associates LLC, said of brokers, “They’re like the missionaries of the industry going out to untapped areas of the market.”
But preaching the gospel of alternative funding exists at different stages across the world. And Goldin, whose company Capify operates in four countries including the US, thinks that many middlemen here at home may not ultimately survive. In an interview, he predicted that the stronger ones over time will be acquired by funding companies and that direct marketing will only increase. “I think more and more companies are going to start building their own internal sales forces,” he said.
Other brokers are not convinced that acquisition costs will lead to the death of their businesses, especially if they’ve already found ways to reduce overhead costs. Several brokers have discreetly mentioned running operations from Costa Rica, Nicaragua or elsewhere as a way to keep things profitable. Still more, like Excel Capital Management based in Manhattan, have found that offering a suite of products allows them to monetize more customers. Chad Otar, a managing partner for Excel, said that they recently brokered a $4.9 million SBA loan. MCA is just one of their options these days. “As long as there’s small businesses, there’s always going to be opportunity,” he said.
In the US, the brokers have certainly seized it, but that’s because most funding companies offer big bucks and quick payment to those that are capable of sourcing customers. In other countries, compensation for services rendered might be the responsibility of the broker to arrange with the merchant since it may not be customary for funding providers to pay commissions. That would mean more work and more risk for the broker.
Ironically, some brokers in the US will tap into both sides, earning a commission from the funder and charging a fee to the merchant for services rendered. And if the broker has payment processing roots, they can go a step further and earn merchant account residuals as well.
Brokers can’t exist without funding companies willing to support their endeavors, of course. While their prevalence around the world varies, most of the funding companies AltFinanceDaily spoke to, appear eager to nurture the middleman’s role, so long as they act responsibly.
“Brokers in the UK are incredibly important as independent advisors to small businesses on the various sources of finance to suit their needs,” said Littner.
And as long as those customers, wherever they may be, are getting the value they want from a broker, that role, so long as it can continue to be done profitably, will likely have a place in the world for the foreseeable future.
Motivating Your Sales Force – Tips From the Floor
August 30, 2016
Fancy steak dinners, electronic devices and cold hard cash are just some of the ways ISOs and funders these days are motivating sales reps to bring in business.
Although it’s largely a field for self-starters, many companies find that even small tokens of appreciation do wonders to increase rep productivity. “Waving a carrot in front of your reps can make a massive difference,” says Zachary Ramirez, branch manager of the Costa Mesa, California branch of World Business Lenders, an ISO and a lender.
When it comes to motivating sales reps, every company does things slightly differently. Some have more established incentive programs, while others are more ad hoc, depending on how the day, week or month is shaping up. The common goal of all the programs, however, is to give a little something to get something greater in return.
Ramirez remembers one sales rep who won a trip to Las Vegas and then continued to be the top rep for three months running. “Those types of rewards can keep a sales team motivated, hungry and excited,” he says.
From time to time, Ramirez offers rewards such as a small cash bonus if a rep meets certain metrics like getting three submissions in a day or multiple fundings in a week. In addition, whenever his reps, who are all hourly employees, hit key performance indicators, Ramirez rewards them with a poker chip. After they accumulate enough, they can trade in their chips for various prizes. Twenty-five poker chips might be worth a flat-screen TV and 50 chips could be an expense-paid trip to Las Vegas, for example.
When it comes to motivation, it’s important to incentivize the correct behavior, Ramirez says, noting that in his earlier years running an ISO, he used to reward reps based on the number of calls they made in a day rather than applications, approvals or fundings.
The latter represent a much more serious commitment and are worth motivating for as opposed to simply making a phone call, where the outcome is uncertain. “Even if they make as many as 500 phone calls in a day, it’s irrelevant if they are not moving the transactions forward by getting applications and bank statements,” he says.
It’s also very important to have clear-cut expectations; reps need to know the consequences of not performing, Ramirez says. Most top salespeople won’t need the stick. But it’s still necessary for them to know the policies, he says.
THE POWER OF SELF-ORIGINATION
One major way United Capital Source incentivizes its 15-person sales force is by self-originating leads. It provides its reps—who are all W2 employees—with merchants that are actively expecting phone calls as opposed to handing them a laundry list of names to pitch which may or may not pan out. It costs more for United Capital to do this, but it works well for the company and for its sales force, says Jared Weitz, chief executive of the New York-based alternative-finance brokerage.
“It enables us to put our guys in a position where they are growing with the company and the company is growing as well,” he says.
In addition, United Capital has an aggressive pay structure that allows salespeople to grow with the company. For instance, the pay plans are all based on how the company is doing overall, as opposed to an individual salesperson’s performance. In this way, it encourages the sales force to work together, as opposed to each person being out for himself. Weitz says its sales team understands that if the company hits x, the sales team gets y. United Capital also offers competitive healthcare and 401(k) plans and there’s no vesting period for employees to receive their 401(k) employer match. Additionally, the company does small things like Friday lunches on the company’s dime as a thank you for time spent. It’s another way to keep the sales team happy, Weitz says.
Fundzio, an alternative funder in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, also works very hard to make sure it keeps up its pipeline of fresh leads so that reps don’t have to do that on their own. Indeed, Fundzio provides them with between seven and ten fresh and promising revenue-earning opportunities each day. This helps tie the reps to Fundzio because they have a continuous stream of business and don’t have to find it on their own.
“It guarantees them at bats every day,” says Edward Siegel, founder and chief executive of Fundzio. It also helps tie the reps to Fundzio because they have constant business. “The key thing is having new leads,” he says.
Additionally, anyone who funds a deal gets to spin a wheel in the office at the end of the business day and earn cash or special prizes like concert tickets or a fancy dinner or a $200 gift certificate. Reps really appreciate getting those prizes, which is evident when they come back to work after enjoying their steak dinner at a Fort Lauderdale waterfront restaurant. “I think it creates a fun and relaxed atmosphere feeling. A little bit goes a long way,” Siegel says.
One way Fundzio motivates reps from the get-go is to bring them on initially as independent contractors. If they prove themselves over a 90-day period, they have the opportunity to become an employee. At any given time, the company has about 20 to 25 sales reps, representing a combination of contractors and W2 employees.
Another way Fundzio helps motivate reps is by allowing them to earn residuals from repeat business for the life of the account as long as they are still employed by the funder. Many funders have renewal departments and reps don’t directly benefit when a customer does repeat business, but that’s not the case at Fundzio, Siegel says.
REVVING UP SALES WITH CONTESTS
Certainly, to succeed in the alternative finance industry, sales reps have to be self-starters. It’s a key requirement to do the job well, in part because so many shops are purely commission-based. Nonetheless, many companies find it helps to grease the wheel a bit—regardless of whether reps are independent or W2 employees.
Fast and Easy Funds, for instance, holds weekly contests to encourage its internal sales force of 15 independent contractors. One week the contest may be for the rep with the most dials, another week it’s for the most submissions and another week for the highest number of deals funded. Each contest pays in the vicinity of $150 to $250 cash. “Every week I change it up. They don’t know what the contest is going to be until the last day of the week,” says David Avidon, president of Fast and Easy Funds, a broker and alternative funder in Boca Raton, Florida.
iAdvanceNow, a brokerage firm in Uniondale, New York, runs daily, weekly and monthly bonuses for its 38-person sales force. For instance, if a rep submits two completed deals for approval in a day he or she might get $100 cash; for three completed deals, the cash bonus might be $250, says Eddie Hamid, president of iAdvanceNow.
On a weekly basis, for submitting six complete files, reps get one spin on a big Wheel of Fortune-like apparatus in the office. Everybody is a winner; the prize depends on where the arrow lands. It may be a cash prize of $20, $50, $100 or a physical prize like a 40 inch-Samsung TV, an Apple Watch or iPad, Hamid explains.
On a monthly basis, meanwhile, each team of five to seven sales reps has a goal. If as a team they reach their goal, they get $1,500. Additionally, the top producer of the month—provided he or she has achieved a minimum of three merchants being funded—receives the top producer bonus of $1,500. The runner-up receives a $1,000 bonus and the third place sales rep receives $500. The top team in the office also gets a steak dinner at a local establishment, Hamid says.
The system works because it gives them a drive to obtain a goal while also encouraging friendly competition, says Hamid, noting that he once overheard reps talking about how much they value being named the top producer. “With sales people, they are more concerned with the recognition than the prize or the money they are receiving,” he says.
iAdvance has been in business for about two years. The current motivational system has been in place for about a year-and-a-half and it seems to work very well to motivate the sales force, Hamid says. In addition, if they are having a down sales month, Hamid ups the ante for the daily goals, adding not only cash, but also prizes.
These techniques all help to light a fire under the sales force, he says.
STRATEGIES FOR SLOW DAYS
Sometimes around 3 p.m., if he feels like the room is starting to quiet, Jordan Lindenbaum, director of sales at Excel Capital Management in New York, a business financing ISO, might offer $20 or $30 cash for the next submission. Or he might offer $40 to $50 for two or three submissions by the end
of the day.
“All it takes is one slow day to kill the energy of a sales rep,” he says.
Lindenbaum finds that motivation checkpoints seem to work well. For instance, at the end of the month, the firm commonly gives a $200 bonus to the sales rep with the most submissions. For actual deals funded, Excel Capital is also working to implement a more concrete revenue-based bonus system as well, Lindenbaum says.
Excel Capital works with independent ISOs in addition to its in-house staff to bring in business. To encourage independent ISOs to refer business, the funding company offers higher payouts to those who consistently bring in high quality deals than to ISOs who bring in deals sporadically.
Chad Otar, co-founder and managing partner at Excel Capital, says a key piece of motivating sales reps is to make sure the sales manager feels motivated as well. Accordingly, the firm also makes sure to motivate Lindenbaum with larger payments for doing an outstanding job of motivating the sales force to bring in deals. “We need to motivate the sales manager so the sales manager motivates the people on the phone. It’s a chain effect. You motivate one and it motivates the others,” he says.
Excel Capital also believes in the power of team rewards. Recently, for instance, company executives treated all staffers to a steak dinner at Delmonico’s in New York City. “We’ve done it many times so our team knows they are appreciated and that our goals were met because everyone worked together,” Otar says.
THE SALARY VS COMMISSION CONUNDRUM
Paying reps a base salary in addition to commissions is another strategy some ISOs use to motivate sales reps. A salary is especially meaningful to reps just starting out, notes Ramirez of World Business Lenders.
He says he has worked with a lot of ISOs and many of them don’t want to pay reps a base salary because they feel it’s a mistake to give them a cushion. Because by doing so, reps get comfortable and when they get comfortable, they don’t push deals—or so the thinking goes. But Ramirez believes this is counterproductive to the rep’s career and the ISO’s sales.
He believes reps should be given a big enough base while they are learning the industry—say for 90 days. Giving them $2,500 a month or so, motivates them and it doesn’t choke their possibility for survival. “You have to give every salesperson the opportunity to succeed. Give them some coaching, give them some guidance, give them a little time. But if there’s no possibility of that rep succeeding or being an asset to your team, it’s important to remove them as efficiently as possible,” he says.
It may seem counter-intuitive, but removing dead weight is also motivating for reps who are really working hard to sell, Ramirez says. To keep that person is demoralizing for the other reps—who may feel they don’t have to work as hard either or who feel they have job security even without doing their best. “It fosters complacency,” he says.





























