Can Factors and MCA Companies Get Along?
April 7, 2017
At the factoring conference in Fort Worth, TX on Thursday, the 2 PM panel was officially called The Fintech Disruption. But it could’ve just as easily been named The MCA Disruption considering that the panelists all ran companies engaged in either unsecured business lending or MCA. The tension in the packed room was palpable. For some factors, the competitive pressure they feel with unsecured finance companies cuts deep, down to their soul. So naturally it only made sense, being that it’s Texas and all, that they lassoed a few of those unsecured guys up and put them on stage to explain theirselves.
So what’s the best way for an MCA company to make a peace offering to a room full of factors?
Sol Lax, the CEO of Pearl Capital Business Funding LLC, kicked it off by telling the audience that a small business customer might begin their quest for capital by searching the internet for a small business loan. “There’s no factoring companies that are going to pop up,” he exclaimed, suggesting that they were already losing when it came to the Internet to acquire customers and had little hope of catching up. But if you are a small factor, he conceded, you should continue generating leads through relationship building since the Internet is now so cost-prohibitive.
Dean Landis, the President of Entrepreneur Growth Capital, ran with that and asked attendees to raise their hands if they really pay attention to the cost of lead acquisition. While this was an informal survey, virtually no one raised their hand, seeming to confirm that deal flow for factors is largely acquired through relationships. Landis, who played the role of moderator and devil’s advocate, asked if MCAs and factors were really even targeting the same customers. Would you lend to someone who already has a senior lien? he asked. “These [MCA] guys figured out how to do that.”
Dan Smith, President of Fora Financial and Paul Rosen, Chief Sales Officer of OnDeck, explained that their customers often seek a fast-paced application-to-funding process, which drew a rebuke from an audience member who had a hard time believing that so many merchants truly needed that speed and simplicity. Smith and Rosen countered by saying that customers will choose whatever is best for them and that not every customer fits their boxes.
Lax advised factors to look at the bigger picture, that one big lender on their own might not seem like a threat but that a company like OnDeck could license out their scoring model to banks and banks could adapt that to make loans to companies they have otherwise been ignoring (the same ones that go to factors) and compete against the factors directly.
As the audience chipped away with questions about the soundness of these scoring models and fintech, Smith of Fora reminded everyone that they still have underwriters that are manually overseeing deals, rather than let computers do everything entirely on their own. “You can literally fintech yourself out of the business,” Smith cautioned lenders who might overzealously replace their core competency with algorithms that don’t perform as well.
But even then, do these scoring models work when merchants gets stacked on? This question was asked and it suggests that stacked merchants have a higher risk of default. Rosen of OnDeck confirmed that when he said “customers that stack on us have much higher loss rates.” Meanwhile, Smith said that when customers are doing something that affects their model, they just need to improve their model, just like they would if there was a recession or some other economic event underway. “All of our models are built on lifetime value,” he said. They want to grow and nurture their clients, he explained.
While factors fear that MCA companies could stack on their clients, there are signs that a path forward exists. An informal poll of the room indicated that not only are factors referring prospects to MCA companies but that MCA companies are returning the favor and sending prospects to them. The former was more prevalent.
Lax of Pearl, was more pointed about the future for factors. “You either need to evolve or become a phone booth,” he proclaimed. He prefaced that with a story about a child who was absolutely befuddled by an old Superman movie, as in ‘what were all these ridiculous random booths doing in the city that enabled Clark Kent to go around changing his clothes?’ The concept of a phone booth could hardly even be explained to the next generation. “Your industry is suffering a phone booth moment,” Lax said to the factors.
Is he right?
To the unsecured lenders and MCA companies who attend the factoring conference, they invariably see value in partnerships. And for the factors still hesitant to take that step, is it really the MCA model that’s causing friction? Or is it the evolution of the way that businesses interact with financial technology, i.e. fintech? And might fintech disrupt everyone in the end?
Only time will tell.
Quotes and paraphrases were derived from the panel. The summary is my own analysis of it and much of the 90-minute discussion was omitted here for brevity.
Blazing Trails in Unexplored Financial Markets
April 4, 2017
Once upon a time people with health insurance who were treated for medical emergencies, illnesses or chronic health conditions –an illness or accident requiring hospitalization, an appendectomy, or a hip replacement, say – could rest easy. Insurance underwriters like United Health, Wellpoint or Humana would surely handle most, if not all, of a patient’s medical expenses.
Today? Not so much. As healthcare becomes ever more pricey, employers are increasingly offering health insurance plans that are less generous and require consumers to pay higher deductibles. Individuals as well are finding that the same goes for them: The only way to afford health insurance is to purchase a plan with a high deductible.
“We’re at a tipping point where the cost of healthcare is outpacing GDP,” says Adam Tibbs, chief executive and co-founder of Parasail Health, a start-up alternative lender in the San Francisco Bay area. “As a result,” he adds, “the only way health insurance can work is either to raise (the cost of) premiums or opt for higher deductibles.”
Statistics confirm Tibbs’s assertion. As of last autumn, according to a September, 2016, survey by Kaiser Family Foundation, the average deductible for workers’ health insurance policies jumped to $1,478, up by more than 12% from $1,318 in 2015. The survey found, moreover, that – for the first time — slightly more than half of all covered workers have deductibles of at least $1,000. At smaller companies, the average deductible is now more than $2,000.
Parasail, a Sausalito-based alternative lender which opened its doors last September, is angling to fill that void. Funded with seed capital raised from four venture capital firms — Healthy Ventures, Montage Ventures, Peter Thiel, and Tiller Partners, reports online data-publisher Crunchbase – Parasail acts as a go-between, connecting the medical practitioners to third-party lenders.
In partnering with doctors, hospitals, and medical clinics, Parasail employs a business model that resembles an auto dealership. After the customers picks out a four-door sedan or a sport utility vehicle, he or she drives it home thanks to a five-year, monthly-payment plan from, say, Capital One.
Similarly, after agreeing to a costly medical procedure, the patient can strike an arrangement with a medical provider’s billing department for on-the-spot financing. Once the deductible is covered, the patient is cleared to glide into the operating room.
Despite being open for less than a year, Tibbs says, Parasail has enlisted as partners some 2,500 medical practitioners with unpaid patient debt of roughly $4 billion. The typical loan averages $6,000. “Our goal,” remarks Parasails marketing vice-president, Dave Matli, “is to create a normal retail experience” so that financing medical debts is as seamless as swiping a credit card.
Meanwhile, industry experts say that Parasail represents a new breed in the financial technology sector. As online alternative lending and the broader fintech industry grow more established, institutional investors and financiers are increasingly wagering bets on companies that promise more than disruptive technologies or cheaper loans.
Increasingly, they are hunting for companies like Parasail that are introducing new products or blazing trails in unexplored markets. “The area that I find most interesting,” says Phin Upham, a venture capitalist and board member at Parasail, is investing in companies that “are developing products that didn’t exist before, serving people who haven’t been served, and playing a unique role incentivizing long-term behaviors.” (Upham, who is a principal at Peter Thiel’s VC firm, emphasizes that he is speaking only for himself.)
Parasail’s fundraising and launch has taken place against a dramatic drop in both global and U.S. fintech financing, according to KPMG’s annual report on the industry, “The Pulse of Fintech.” The accounting firm reports that total funding for fintech companies and deal activity plummeted by more than 50% in the U.S. in 2016 to $12.8 billion from $27 billion the prior year. KPMG attributed much of the drop to “political and regulatory uncertainty, a decline in megadeals, and investor caution.”
The year “2016 brought reality back to the market” after the banner, record-shattering year of 2015, the report noted.
Venture capital financing in the U.S., however, did not slip as dramatically as overall funding, sliding some 30% to $4.6 billion from $6 billion in 2015. (Almost overlooked in the report was that corporate investment capital was “the most active in the past seven years,” KPMG’s report notes, representing 18 percent of venture fintech financing.)
Steve Krawciw, a New York-based fintech startup executive asserts that “the business has matured and, yes, there have been defaults, but the business model for fintech has stabilized.” The author of “Real-Time Risk: What Investors Should Know About FinTech, High-Frequency Trading, and Flash Crashes,” Krawciw expects more funding to stream into the industry as new players such as banks, insurance companies, hedge funds and private equity get involved. They’ll “go in a number of different directions,” he reckons, “especially direct lending by hedge funds and private equity firms.”
No figures have yet been released by KPMG for the first quarter of 2017, just ended in March, but fintech industry participants are mightily impressed at news of the $500 million financing for Social Finance Inc. (SoFi). Best known for its refinancing of student loans, the San Francisco firm reported on February 24 that it raised a half-billion dollars in a financing round led by private equity firm Silver Lake Partners. Other investors include SoftBank Group and GPI Capital, bringing SoFi’s total investment to $1.9 billion, the company said in a press release.
SoFi, which plans to use the funds to expand online lending into international markets and devise new financial products, is ambitiously transforming itself into an online financial emporium. Along with a suite of online wares that mimic traditional banking and financial products – savings accounts, life insurance policies and mutual funds – SoFi has also invented new online offerings.
For example, SoFi formed a partnership with secondary mortgage lender Fannie Mae and, together, the companies are enabling borrowers to refinance both mortgage and student debt. The SoFi financing, says Krawciw, “is not a seminal deal, it’s a sign of what’s coming.”
SoFi may also be providing a road map for fintech companies like Parasail. After building a customer base with health-care loans at 5.88% annual percent rate — compared with credit cards charging interest rates about four times as much – Parasail could be poised to sell additional products to its built-in audience.
Just as SoFi got big on refinancing student loans, Parasail could use healthcare lending as a springboard for future financial endeavors. Its revenues have been growing by 50% month-over-month.
By the first quarter of next year, Tibbs says, the firm will be breaking even.” And at that point, he adds, it expects to roll out a menu of new products too.
Does Fintech Have a Distinctively British Accent? – From Congressman McHenry’s Speech
April 1, 2017Regulation around technology-enabled lending has generally been a point of contention in the US. Even regulators are finding themselves at odds with other regulators, like the OCC vs. the NYDFS for example. Might relationships like these be contributing to America’s innovative decline?
At LendIt last month, Congressman Patrick McHenry (R-NC) said, “Is it any wonder that Fintech has a distinctively British accent these days? It’s good reason. We have regulatory competition around the globe, but we don’t have the right regulatory competition here in the United States. And while we have a patchwork of conflicting, and overlapping, and confusing regulations, in places like the U.K., they’re creating an entire ecosystem of financial innovation and allowing it to flourish. And they become the model for the rest of the world and the intellectual property center for the rest of the globe when it should be here in the United States.”
Forward-looking regulation has helped a nation like Kenya make the movement of money cheaper in their country than it costs to move money here, McHenry said. “They’ve moved generations ahead overnight,” he exclaimed.
If you haven’t seen the video, check it out below:
Or you can read the full text from our transcription of it:
“And thank you all for being here. This is a wonderful celebration on, you know, a stereotypical February or March day here in New York. Cold as can be. Good to be inside. But thank you for taking the time to gather. The work that you’re about improves the American economy, gives more options for my constituents and for the citizens across this great country of ours, and gives them better options and opportunities to make decisions for themselves and put power back into their hands in a very competitive environment.
In fact, it’s really liberating to be out of D.C. especially at moments like this. You don’t know what the latest news story is gonna be or the latest tweet, so good to talk about something meaningful over the long run. And the reason why I’m here is because my focus legislatively has been around utilizing technology for innovative forms of finance.
I came about this in a very simple way that’s relatable to other people. But you know, the idea of Fintech, in 10 years, in 20 years, the term “Fintech” will be scoffed at kind of the way that we scoff at how they described Amazon 20 years ago. They said it was an e-Commerce site, that it was a webpage. Right? And we laugh at people that would describe it that way today. Every company that’s in the retail space has an e-Commerce site. Everyone is competing in this new form that Amazon represented the new wave of 20 years ago. So, the term “Fintech” may be much like referring to something as not a website, but a webpage. And in time, the way people are interacting with the banking system is going to continue to change in fundamentally different ways.
It’s exciting to think about how consumers and small businesses across America are gonna find these new ways to access capital over the next generation. And you all are at the forefront of that. And at D.C., I’ve tried to lead the change of that change in mindset. And you know, this is not only about helping Fintech companies, but also about fundamentally altering how regulators interact with innovative companies. And so, the focus on lending, helping families access capital as I said in the beginning, I came to it in a very natural way.
I saw my father start a small business as a child. When I was a child, the youngest of 5 kids, I saw my father start a business in the backyard mowing grass. Very simple, relatable thing. Most of us have mowed grass at some point in our life. And my father started that small business in our backyard and he used the great financial innovation of his time to buy his second piece of equipment, which he put on a MasterCharge. Great financial innovation and that helped him start a small business.
Now, that small business didn’t change the world, but it changed my brother’s and sister’s lives and put the 5 of us through college. That’s a meaningful thing and that is the American dream as my father defined it and as I define it. Now, that’s not creating Facebook. It’s not this other sort of revolution of internet technology, but it certainly made a huge difference in our community and for our family.
So, how did we utilize technology and help those small businesses like my father access and grow? The plight of small business in America though right now is real. The next generation of small business owners are struggling to get off the ground. The facts are that small business loans used to make up a majority of bank balance sheets. Now, 20 years— Well, in 1995, they were majority of the bank balance sheets. Now, it’s 20% of bank balance sheets.
Now, you also see small town America, which used to lead the country in small business starts, small counties, small communities across the country have lagged. So, smaller counties used to lead the nation in new businesses even as late as the 1990s, mid `90s. But just in this decade alone, small counties have lost businesses. U.S. counties with 100,000 people or fewer residents lost more businesses than they created. We see stagnation among small business owners and small business starts. This is why Fintech is so vital and so important. Technology is the only way to ensure that we spread and democratize capital outside of Austin, Boston, Silicon Valley, and New York.
How do we get the rest of the country, small town America, and even the urban areas that don’t get the focus and attention? And so, I think the power of harnessing big data is gonna fundamentally change the way we look at debt. It’s already happening. And you’re the leaders of it. Instead of relying on the credit score, which was a great innovation in the 1970s, fixed the problem in the 1970s, today, companies are using big data to better understand who will and who should qualify for loans. And what we’re discovering is that the way we help people out of debt is by understanding the data behind the debt.
Look at the way technology is fundamentally changing lives and places like Kenya. Think of this. In Kenya, the phone, your smartphone, our smartphone is that way to financial inclusion in Kenya. The movement of money cheaper in Kenya than it is here because of this simple device. It’s more powerful in that jurisdiction than in ours because of regulation and forward-looking regulation. And instead of loading buses filled with luggage that’s filled with cash in moving money in Kenya, they’re now doing it through a fast transfer over their mobile device. They’ve moved generations ahead overnight. And in fact, in many ways, they’re leading the world in Fintech deployment. So, we’re living in a new and exciting era in financial services. It’s actually matched the best interest of consumer protection with the demands of global smartphone-led revolution that we, as consumers, are driving. Now, that’s what’s happening in the real world.
So, let me translate back to you what is happening in the analog world of Washington. D.C. The regulatory challenges of Fintech are real. It’s major in Washington. We have a diversity of regulators. That’s certainly part of our American system. And that’s not gonna change any time soon. So, what is the current landscape? If you are in Fintech and you wanna make sure you’re complying with financial laws and regulations, where do you go? Who do you ask? Who do you talk to? Is there an open door in Washington? Do you know who your regulator is? Do you know who your regulator should be? Do they meet with you? Are they willing to meet with you? What’s your legal and compliance cost before you even get a product hashed out? These are major things you have to wrestle with in starting your businesses or growing your businesses. So, believe it or not, the difficult question is who do you talk to in Washington? And there is no simple answer. And because there’s so little clarity on which regulator to go to, often there’s even less clarity of how the underlying laws or regulations are being enforced by that regulator in this new marketplace.
And so, this is the hidden secret of Washington. The regulators themselves are so behind when it comes to understanding technology that they themselves do not really know how to apply regulation to innovations in Fintech. They just simply do not know. And trust me, I realize this as a legislator. 5 years ago, I helped craft what is called the JOBS Act. I wrote a piece of the JOBS Act. It resulted in 14 pages of legislative text around investment crowdfunding. 14 pages of legislative text. 3 years later, the Securities and Exchange Commission wrote 700 pages of regulation around my 14 pages of law. And if you are all involved in investment crowdfunding under Title 3 of the JOBS Act,— three of you, right— there will be a lot more had they written good regulation and actually complied with the mindset of Congress when we passed the JOBS Act.
So, I see this when regulators don’t actually know how to meet the demands of innovation and what’s happening in this information revolution that we have. And so, as a result, America is actually falling further behind the rest of the world. And unlike other areas of the world, which have created regulatory sandboxes for banks and technology companies to innovate and find a light-touch regulation, here in Washington or there in Washington, regulators are struggling to adapt.
And is it any wonder that Fintech has a distinctively British accent these days? It’s good reason. We have regulatory competition around the globe, but we don’t have the right regulatory competition here in the United States. And while we have a patchwork of conflicting, and overlapping, and confusing regulations, in places like the U.K., they’re creating an entire ecosystem of financial innovation and allowing it to flourish. And they become the model for the rest of the world and the intellectual property center for the rest of the globe when it should be here in the United States.
Well, while we’re all trying to figure out whether or not virtual currencies are more like property or money here in the United States, top countries around the world are using digital currency to move payment platforms overnight, change payment platforms, make it cheaper, more affordable to move funds for the smallest and the biggest. So, while the world’s rapidly adopting new financial technology to expand the middle class, our country’s regulators have created capital deserts here in the United States in rural and in urban areas. We understand the notion of an urban food desert. If you can get good food that is close to your home in an urban area, you can actually feed your children wholesome meals. We understand that. That’s a big discussion. Well, likewise, we’re starving off small business innovators in urban areas and let’s say less desirable zip codes in urban areas and less desirable zip codes in rural areas. And so, we’re starving off opportunity and that has a result in small business starts and the rise from the turn in the economy from those that are living on the margins to those that move up to the upper middle class and upper class based off being starved from capital.
We have to fix that. Fintech is the solution, but the regulation has to change. And that is something that I’ve been focused on over the last 6 years. And I think we have a trilogy of good ideas that I would submit to you this morning. First is let me just tell you my mindset in regulating and legislating. And to borrow from startup culture, the bills that I try to focus on are minimal viable bill. It’s a simple idea.
One idea that focuses on solving a discrete problem. Something in the marketplace that needs a regulatory fix in order to flourish. And it will help the greatest number of people and have the greatest impact on tech companies, bank startups, and small business folks and families. So, looking at the headache test, one of the areas of interaction with the government that’s creating unnecessary delay is the IRS not having a piece of technology that will allow people to verify income data.
And so, as a result of that, I’ve — legislation that is called the IRS Data Verification Modernization Act, 45060 for those of you who are in the game on this, but it simply will do this. It will automate a bottleneck manual process that is utilized via e-mail and fax with the IRS in verifying basic information that you, as lenders, need to allow mortgages, student debt, refinancing, and small business loans. It’s the taxpayer’s information. You pay for the service to verify it. We should have better service rather than the shoddy service IRS is currently giving you. You should be able to get this in an instant with an API rather than getting something faxed to you in 7 to 10 days. It’s absurd that the IRS can’t update and we’re gonna force them to update.
Our second bill, it goes directly to returning consistent uniform systems for our capital markets, which I believe is a fundamental thing in our 50-state regime with a variety of regulators. We have to have some base level of understanding on what is valid. And the bill is simple. It codifies the Valid-When-Made Doctrine that we’ve had in this country for nearly 100 years. And that was an established legal precedent prior to the Second Circuit Court’s decision in the Madden case. Madden versus Midland. And our view is the Second Circuit’s opinion was unprecedented. It’s created uncertainty for Fintech companies, banks, and the credit markets; making credit less available and more expensive. So, the simple fix is returning to the Valid-When-Made Doctrine. Congress under our constitutional system has the right to make this very clear to the courts of our intention when we pass the original law and nothing has changed when it comes to this. And this is the second bill that I’ll be pushing this year.
And finally, a third piece of legislation that is broader in discussion and it’s the Financial Services Innovation Act. This bill creates a new paradigm for regulators in Washington. It says in a first of a kind way, it forces regulators to meet the demands of rapid innovation in financial services. Instead of the old analog version of command and control regulation that’s messy and rigid based off of opinion, not fact, my bill requires agencies of jurisdiction to create offices of innovation that will engage with entrepreneurs and provide a regulatory on-ramp for financial innovation. It basically forces all the regulators, all the financial regulators to create a new door for financial innovation. A welcoming door. Come in with your ideas. Let’s talk about regulations that can enable this technology to flourish. And in getting data in return, the agency would be in permanent beta testing mode, which would give them data to prove out consumer benefit or consumer harm. It will give them data to adopt the whole footprint of regulation in all these financial regulators.
Now, that is a major mindset shift for our financial regulators, a major mindset shift for any regulator in our American system of governance. But with thorough analysis, I believe that innovators will be better off in this regime when you have data that is driving the decision making of regulators and regulators driving decisions that are informed rather than opinion based.
Now, saying that we’re gonna base our politics off of fact these days is its own enormous political challenge, but I think it’s important that we all agree facts are important things and we should base our decision-making solely on that set of facts in order to do the right thing for our country, the right thing for our economy, right thing for families, right thing for small business starts. So, permanent beta testing involves continuously evolving, testing, and proving. It’s what you do everyday as innovators.
Now, those are 3 major pieces of legislation that can have an impact, but the mindset in Washington is much— Well, it’s much different than you might think. Legislators are eager for new ideas, for new information. They’re eager to hear what you are about and what you’re doing. And given the nature and the speed of innovation, you have an obligation to be engaged in Washington. If you’re not engaged in Washington, Washington is still gonna be engaged in what you do. You’re just gonna get worse rather than better. So, if you inform decision makers you have data to backup what you’re expressing, what you’re advocating for, we’re gonna be better off, but you all in your pitches, right, have to— The basic startup pitch, you’ve got to answer one question. Why now? Why now? I think American financial innovation is at an inflection point. I really do. We’ll either lead the world in the next few years or we’re gonna be left behind. It’s our choice. It’s our choice. And it’s time that regulators treat innovation no longer as a threat, but as an opportunity to consumers. It’s time to recognize that regulators need to recognize— I think it’s time that they recognize that consumer protection and innovation are not mutually exclusive. Now, that’s the reason why it’s now, but it’s not gonna happen unless you engage in Washington and make your voices heard. You’ve gotta make your voices heard in order to get the results we need so we can have innovation flourish in this country, that we can be the market leader for the world, that we can be an exporter of these ideas rather than having to export ourselves to different markets in order to take that data and that mindset and deploy those resources globally.
Let’s make sure that we can lead this market to better and greater things. With your engagement, we can. Without your engagement, we’re gonna be left behind. So please, please engage in Washington. Make your voices heard. And with your voices being heard, I think we can have change for the better. So, thank you for your leadership. Thank you for the opportunity to be here with you. God bless.”
Citing Unnamed Sources, Reuters Reports Kabbage Possibly Looking to Acquire OnDeck
March 23, 2017
Reuters is reporting that Kabbage is in talks to raise equity capital to potentially use for acquisitions and that OnDeck is one of several targets under consideration. As Reuters attributed the OnDeck portion to just one of their multiple unnamed sources, it’s entirely speculative at this point.
From a theoretical perspective, would such a thing make sense?
Kabbage has momentum on their side right now. Their recent half billion dollar securitization that was finalized earlier this month was oversubscribed. Although they only originated about half the loan volume of OnDeck last year, Kabbage’s last private market valuation ($1 billion in Oct 2015) is nearly 3x as large as OnDeck’s current market cap.
Valuations in the industry have changed a lot over the last 18 months but there’s no doubt that Kabbage has become a unique competitor. At LendIt, company CEO Rob Frohwein revealed a bit of their secret sauce when he said that their customers borrow from them on average 20-25 times over the course of 4 years, whereas their competitors make only 2.2 loans to their customers on average.
There is a general view in this industry that acquiring a competitor adds little value other than more marketshare. Kabbage, however, may potentially believe that (1) OnDeck is too undervalued to pass up (2) That OnDeck could generate better margins using Kabbage’s strategy (3) That OnDeck’s partner relationships would add additional value (4) That the company cultures are compatible enough to make an acquisition work (5) that the combined entity would allow them to better align their political and regulatory agendas.
We mustn’t forget however that a single unnamed source is pretty weak to go off of. One possible reason that someone would want to report that OnDeck is an acquisition target is to cause a temporary spike in their stock price. (and I certainly do not have any position in the stock)
For now, it’s fun to think about such an acquisition scenario and we’ll report more, if and when we hear anything.
In This Online Lender’s Earnings Report, Profits, MCAs and Term Loans
March 22, 2017Limited details were offered when Enova, a publicly traded company, acquired The Business Backer (TBB) in June 2015. For one, the Cincinnati Business Courier had the exclusive, which one might not describe as the typical go-to source for online finance news. But TBB was not typical. Based in Blue Ash, Ohio as opposed to New York City or San Francisco, the company had originally focused on offering merchant cash advances before eventually expanding their suite of solutions to include other products.
According to Enova’s earnings report, TBB had been purchased for $26.4 million with an estimated contingent $5.7 million of that being based on future earn-out opportunities. There was a caveat though. If future operating results exceeded expectations, that contingent amount could increase over time, but not beyond where the total consideration paid for the company exceeded $71 million. As of 2016’s year-end, that contingent amount had increased by $3.3 million.
Enova’s report makes several mentions of their merchant cash advance business or as they call them, receivable purchase agreements (RPAs). For the most part, they obscure the financial metrics of this aspect by lumping it in with installment loans. These installment loans are described as “multi-payment unsecured consumer installment loan products in 17 states in the United States and in the United Kingdom and Brazil” with repayment periods of two to sixty months, so yeah, they’re pretty different.
Their RPA customers, however, “average approximately $1.5 million in annual sales and 10 years of operating history while those who obtain an open line of credit account average approximately $450 thousand in annual sales and 7 years of operating history,” the report says. These lines of credit are primarily offered through a business lending subsidiary called Headway Capital.
While companies like Lending Club and OnDeck grab all the headlines, Enova describes itself as a “leading technology and analytics company focused on providing online financial services.” And in 2016, they extended nearly $2.1 billion in credit to borrowers and had a net income of $34.6 million.
On the company’s Q4 earnings call in February, Company CEO David Fisher said, “There currently seems to be a bit of a shakeout occurring in the non-bank small business lending and financing industry. A number of our competitors have either ceased funding or completely shut down over the past several months. From the intelligence we were able to gather, this is largely due to credit issues and their portfolios. As we mentioned last quarter, we have taken a more methodical approach than some to growth for our small business products. And we’re now seeing the benefits of that approach. Recent advantages of our small business book are performing well and the unit economics continue to improve especially as acquisition costs have dropped following the shakeout I just mentioned.”
Enova’s small business financing portfolio only constituted 12% of their loan portfolio at the end of last year. And at $13.70 a share, the company’s current market cap is larger than OnDeck’s.
Kabbage Prices $525 Million Securitization; Anticipates “A(sf)” Rating on Its Debt
March 8, 2017Kabbage®, a pioneering financial services, technology and data platform, today announced that on March 7, 2017, it priced $525 million of fixed-rate, asset-backed notes in a private securitization transaction. The facility is expandable to $1.5 billion. The notes will be issued in four classes by Kabbage Asset Securitization LLC, a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of Kabbage Inc. The senior class of notes is anticipated to be rated “A(sf)” on the closing date by Kroll Bond Rating Agency (KBRA). Guggenheim Securities is serving as sole structuring advisor and initial purchaser of the notes. The securitization is expected to close on or about March 20, 2017, and is subject to customary closing conditions.
The securitization was significantly oversubscribed with interest from top-tier institutional investors. This represents the largest asset-backed securitization of small business loans in the online lending industry, next to Kabbage’s prior, expandable, ABS note issuance in March 2014. This new facility will enable Kabbage to continue to broaden its product mix by offering larger credit lines and longer term loans.
“In a time when the FinTech industry has experienced challenges, our automated technology and data platform has demonstrated to investors Kabbage’s ability to deliver superior and predictable performance on small business loans as an asset class,” said Kevin Phillips, Head of Corporate Development for Kabbage. “Both the overwhelming investment interest and the anticipated strength of our bond rating are testaments to our proven approach to underwriting and managing small business loan performance through the Kabbage Platform.”
In March 2014, Kabbage was the first technology-enabled, financial services company to issue asset-backed notes secured by small business loans. This transaction was initially $270 million and was subsequently expanded to $545 million by the issuance of additional notes to multiple capital markets investors. This facility enabled Kabbage to dramatically scale its volume to extend over $2.7 billion through the platform.
The anticipated KBRA rating of “A(sf)” reflects an upgrade from the rating on Kabbage’s prior securitization. “Kabbage’s strong historical performance over the last three years played a key part in KBRA’s upgrade,” said Anthony Nocera, Managing Director at KBRA. “The upgrade is based on several structural improvements and the existence of more historical performance data relating to Kabbage’s collateral.”
About Kabbage
Kabbage Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, has pioneered a financial services data and technology platform to provide automated funding to small businesses in minutes. Kabbage leverages data generated through business activity such as accounting data, online sales, shipping and dozens of other sources to understand performance and deliver fast, flexible funding in real time. Kabbage is funded and backed by leading investors, including Reverence Capital Partners, SoftBank Capital, Thomvest Ventures, Mohr Davidow Ventures, BlueRun Ventures, the UPS Strategic Enterprise Fund, ING, Santander InnoVentures, Scotiabank and TCW/Craton. All Kabbage U.S.-based loans are issued by Celtic Bank, a Utah-Chartered Industrial Bank, Member FDIC. For more information, please visit http://www.kabbage.com.
The notes will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or any state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from, or a transaction not subject to, registration requirements. The notes were offered only to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and to persons outside the United States pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to sell the notes, nor shall it constitute an offer, solicitation or sale in any jurisdiction in which, or to any person to whom, such an offer or solicitation or sale is unlawful.
Upstart Raises $32.5M
March 6, 2017It’s been three years since we launched the Upstart lending platform, and today we’re pleased to announce we’ve raised $32.5M to take our business to the next level. The funding round was lead by Rakuten, a global leader in internet services and global innovation headquartered in Japan, and by a large US based asset manager. Existing investors Third Point Ventures, Khosla Ventures, and First Round Capital also participated. We’re particularly excited to have Oskar Mielczarek de la Miel, Oskar Miel, Managing Partner of the Rakuten FinTech Fund join Upstart’s Board of Directors.
With more than 50,000 loans originated, Upstart has the highest consumer ratings in the industry, has Net Promoter Scores (NPS) in excess of 80, and has delivered industry-leading returns to loan investors.
Leaders in Technology and Data Science for Lending
Upstart was the first platform to leverage modern data science and technology to power credit decisions, automate verification, and deliver a superior borrower experience. In 2014, we were first to launch next-day funding. In the last year, we virtually eliminated loan stacking on the Upstart platform, a central cause of credit issues in online lending. Today, more than 20% of our loans are fully automated, helping us attract the best quality borrowers with a superior experience.
As a result of our efforts, we’ve seen unparalleled credit performance, with 2016 cohorts our strongest yet. Upstart loans are funded in four distinct ways: 1) whole loan sales to institutions, 2) retention by Upstart’s originating bank partner, 3) sales to Upstart itself, and 4) via individuals in our fractional market. Furthermore, we expect our first loan securitization transaction within a few months.
2017 and Beyond!
We’ve focused considerable effort on our credit quality and loan economics, and the results speak for themselves. We aim to originate more than $1B in loans in 2017, and expect to reach cash flow profitability this year.
But that’s not all. We’re also thrilled to announce that Sanjay Datta has joined Upstart as CFO. Sanjay was formerly VP of Global Advertising Finance at Google, having spent a decade to help build and internationally expand Google’s $80B core economic engine.
Those that know my history at Google will understand why I’m excited to tell you about “Powered by Upstart”, a Software-as-a Service offering derived from Upstart’s top-rated consumer lending platform. From rate requests through servicing and collections, this new service brings modern technology and data science to the entire lending lifecycle.
Our beginnings
Anna, Paul, and I founded Upstart to bring the best of Google to consumer lending. Upstart was the first platform to leverage modern data science and technology to power credit decisions, automate verification, and deliver a superior borrower experience. In 2014, we were first to launch next-day funding. As of today, more than 20% of our loans are fully automated and we expect this percentage to increase significantly through 2017. With more than 50,000 Upstart loans originated, we have the highest consumer ratings in the industry and have delivered industry-leading returns to loan investors. With Net Promoter Scores (NPS) in excess of 80, we’re excited about the impact we’re having.
Technology partner
FinTech is disrupting all areas of financial services. As a leading tech platform in marketplace lending, Upstart aims to partner with financial institutions rather than compete with them. Given the pace of change in lending, technology partnerships will be critical in the years to come, and Upstart aims to be a partner the industry can rely on.
But “Powered by Upstart” is not just software – it’s a turnkey solution that provides all necessary document review, verification phone calls, fraud analysis, and (optionally) customer service, loan servicing and collections.
Software-as-a-Service in lending
SaaS has grown exponentially in the last decade because of its obvious virtues: rather than buying, installing, configuring, hosting, and supporting software yourself, the software is delivered over the cloud. It’s more reliable and always up to date. Delivering cloud software can be challenging in any industry. Usability, reliability, and performance are the minimum to play, and effective change management is critical to success. As the team that delivered Google’s SaaS platform before it was called “cloud”, we understand these challenges.
Of course, the regulatory environment in lending raises the bar even higher. We’ve long demonstrated our commitment to trustful and compliant lending, and we’re likewise committed to delivering robust and compliant lending software.
Patch of Land Hires Chief Investment Product Officer, Matthew Zall, Recognized Capital Markets Expert and Innovator of Lending Products for the Single-Family Home Rental Market
March 5, 2017LOS ANGELES- March 6, 2017 – Patch of Land, a leading online real estate marketplace lender and crowdfunding platform, announces the addition of Matthew Zall as Chief Investment Product Officer as the firm prepares to expand into the single-family rental market with longer term, permanent financing products. The number of non-owner occupied single-family properties in the U.S. including townhomes, condos, and 2-4 unit properties grew to almost 24 million units valued at over $6 trillion in 2016, according to ATTOM Data Solutions.
Zall brings to Patch of Land more than 12 years of real estate and mortgage experience, as well as expertise in financing and product development. He pioneered three of the industry’s first-ever multi-borrower single-family rental securitizations, helping to build Blackstone Group subsidiary, B2R Finance, (now known as Finance of America Holdings, LLC) from start up to a multibillion dollar lender in only a few years. Prior to joining B2R, Matt was a Commercial Real Estate (CRE) trader at J.P. Morgan and Bear Stearns. At Patch of Land, Zall will execute strategies to enable the expansion of the firm’s position as a marketplace lender by offering both accredited and institutional investors additional opportunities to invest in this asset class.
“Patch of Land’s marketplace is designed to meet the lending needs of real estate investors. The addition of Matt enables us to continue the expansion of our marketplace to fully serve the lending needs of more than 10 million Americans who directly invest in single-family residential properties and need consistent, reliable access to capital to fuel their businesses,” said Paul Deitch, Patch of Land’s Chief Executive Officer. “We are excited about adding Matt to our executive team as he is passionate about our mission to leverage technology to improve the borrowing experience for the real estate entrepreneur and at the same time offer investors from both Main Street and Wall Street the opportunity to participate in this attractive asset class.”
About Patch of Land
Since issuing its first real estate loan in October 2013, Patch of Land has been recognized in the financial technology space as a leader in online real estate lending. The company employs its proprietary technology to efficiently fill a void in the real estate finance industry by providing borrowers access to capital for residential and commercial real estate projects. The platform also establishes a marketplace through which qualified individual and institutional investors can participate in private real estate projects with low minimum investments, predictable returns and first-lien secured loans.
More information is available at www.PatchofLand.com or by calling 888-959-1465.
Media Contact: Glen Orr
glenlorr@gmail.com
469.441.3203
